Understanding Goal Achievement in Sports: What Research Reveals About Elite Performance
- Dr Paul McCarthy
- 4 hours ago
- 17 min read
Athletic performance and goal achievement in sports largely depend on psychological factors. A study of 136 young athletes between 13 and 18 years showed that players with strong task goal orientation felt less cognitive anxiety during competitions . Athletes who believed in their sports abilities experienced lower somatic anxiety while competing than those who questioned their capabilities .
Research about achievement goal theory in sports paints a clear picture. Studies show that high task orientation levels connect with positive cognitive, affective, and behavioral results . But high ego orientation usually leads to neutral or poor outcomes, especially in athletes who doubt their abilities . An athlete's purpose in showing competence through action is a vital part of their approach to training and competition .
This piece explores how different goal orientations shape elite performance. We'll get into what research tells us about making achievement motivation theory work better in competitive environments. The research shows that ego and performance goals often result in athletes avoiding challenges, giving up easily, and losing their inner drive . Task-based approaches, on the other hand, tend to work better.
Achievement Goal Theory in Elite Sports Context
Achievement Goal Theory (AGT) is a key framework in sports psychology that shows how athletes define success and approach competition. AGT looks at how motivation and behavior work in competitive settings, especially how athletes review their skills and success.
Task vs Ego Orientation in Competitive Settings
Achievement Goal Theory shows two main ways athletes view success in competitive environments. Task orientation (sometimes called mastery orientation) and ego orientation (also known as performance orientation) are two different ways to define achievement in sports.
Task-oriented athletes measure success through personal growth, skill mastery, and effort. These athletes judge their abilities based on their own progress instead of comparing themselves to others [1]. Athletes who are mainly task-oriented get several benefits:
They stay motivated and enjoy what they do
They bounce back better from setbacks
They like challenging tasks that help them grow
They keep trying whatever the competition results
On the flip side, ego-oriented athletes measure success by beating others and showing they're better. They judge themselves by matching their performance against competitors [1]. Athletes with high ego orientation usually:
Care most about winning and comparing themselves to others
Pick tasks where they can prove they're better
Feel more anxiety during competition
Give up easier when things get tough
Research shows task orientation has a positive link to sport performance (r = 0.17), while ego orientation has a weaker connection (r = 0.09) [2]. Task-focused environments also help performance (r = 0.20), but ego-focused environments don't make much difference [2]. This suggests task orientation might be better for consistent performance.
Athletes can have both orientations. Many top athletes score high in both task and ego measures - they want to improve while also beating others [3]. Top performers often have this mix of wanting to excel personally and compete against others.
Relevance of Achievement Motivation Theory for Elite Athletes
Achievement Motivation Theory matters a lot to elite athletes because of their intense performance needs. Achievement motivation drives athletes to excel, which means "wanting to do well, succeed and reach standards for yourself and others" [4].
Top competitors who understand achievement motivation know why they keep going despite possible failure - this is crucial in high-level sports. The theory explains why some elite athletes seek challenges while others avoid them [5].
Recent studies of achievement goals in elite sports show interesting results. Task-focused environments helped performance (r = 0.25), while ego-focused environments hurt it (r = -0.09) [2]. Elite and non-elite athletes also responded differently to task-focused environments [2].
Coaches and sport psychologists can use these findings in their work. They should create task-oriented environments since research shows this approach ranges from neutral to helpful [2]. Training that focuses on skill development, effort, and personal growth will likely lead to better performance.
The story with ego orientation is more complex. While it might help select performers (since it links to performance), this connection isn't completely clear [2]. Competition might motivate some top athletes, but just focusing on ego-oriented approaches isn't enough for lasting elite performance.
Achievement Goal Theory gives athletes and coaches good strategies to improve performance in elite competition. We still need more research with elite athletes to fully understand how task and ego orientations affect high-level competitive performance [2].
Dispositional Goal Orientation (DGO) and Performance Outcomes
Goal orientations work as stable personality traits that shape how athletes view success and define competence in their sports. These orientations are lasting tendencies that affect motivation, performance, and mental well-being in competitive situations of all types.
High Task Orientation and Intrinsic Motivation
Athletes with high task orientation measure success based on personal criteria—how much they improve, master skills, and put in effort. This mindset builds lasting motivation that stays strong whatever the competition results. Research shows that task-oriented athletes gain several performance advantages:
Task orientation has a positive link to subjective performance measures (r = 0.21), which is stronger than its connection to objective metrics (r = 0.08) [6]. Task-oriented athletes show higher intrinsic motivation levels that boost their work rate, self-esteem, and confidence [7]. Their inner drive helps shield them from competitive pressure so they stay focused during tough situations.
Research on elite athletes shows task orientation has an even stronger link to performance (r = 0.25) compared to sub-elite athletes (r = 0.16) [6]. This suggests self-improvement becomes more valuable at the highest competitive levels.
Task orientation helps protect athletes from physical and emotional burnout [8]. Path analysis shows that task orientation reduces burnout signs through self-driven goal motives [8]. These athletes chase goals that match their personal values instead of external demands, which creates lasting motivation.
Research reveals task-oriented athletes are more mindful and aware during competition [7]. This awareness helps them use both internal and external feedback better, which maximizes their performance through focus control and flow states.
Ego Orientation and Performance-Approach Goals
Ego orientation makes athletes judge success by comparing themselves to others—beating competitors and showing superior skill with minimal effort. While often seen negatively, ego orientation's effect on performance is complex.
Studies show ego orientation has a slight positive connection to both objective (r = 0.10) and subjective (r = 0.10) performance measures [6]. Elite athletes show a stronger performance connection (r = 0.23) than sub-elite athletes (r = 0.06) [6]. This suggests comparing yourself to others might help at higher levels where standing out matters more.
Ego orientation's effects link mainly to controlled goal motives—pursuing goals from external pressure or internal obligation [8]. This pattern increases physical and emotional exhaustion through these controlled motivation paths [8].
Athletes face bigger problems when they have high ego orientation but low task orientation. They put in less effort, lose motivation, feel more anxious, and show more aggression during competition [7]. This happens because they focus only on risks instead of staying present, which blocks flow states [7].
Research found an ideal profile: athletes high in both task and ego orientation usually enjoy their sport the most [7]. This combined approach lets competitors benefit from personal improvement and comparison with others, creating motivation systems that work together.
These findings suggest athletes should focus on task-oriented approaches while using ego-oriented strategies in specific situations. The evidence also shows that performance-approach goals work better when driven by internal motivation rather than external pressure [8].
Motivational Climate (MC) and Its Short-Term Effects
The social-psychological environment around athletes shapes their motivation and performance. Motivational climate (MC) represents the composite view of situationally emphasized goal structures in achievement settings [9]. Unlike dispositional orientations, motivational climates can change faster based on coach behaviors, feedback patterns, and evaluative standards used in training sessions.
Task-Involving vs Ego-Involving Climate Definitions
Motivational climate comes directly from Achievement Goal Theory and shows up in two distinct forms. A task-involving climate (sometimes called mastery climate) emphasizes skill improvement, personal development, and effort. Athletes in this environment learn through proper handling of errors, cooperation between teammates, and individual growth [10]. Coaches build this atmosphere by highlighting:
Personal mastery and improvement as main success indicators
Effort as the path to achievement
Cooperation rather than rivalry among team members
Recognition for all participants whatever their ability level
An ego-involving climate (or performance climate) centers on showing superiority through interpersonal competition and social comparison [10]. This environment typically features public evaluation, special treatment for talented athletes, and emphasis on outperforming others [11]. Normative-based evaluation is the life-blood of this climate, among other explicit or implicit punishment for mistakes [12].
Research shows these climates rarely exist alone. Sporting environments usually contain elements of both, with one taking the lead [13]. Athletes who see high levels of both task and ego climate factors showed better psychological responses than those in mainly ego-oriented environments [13].
Coach-Induced MC in Training Environments
Coaches design the motivational climate through their behaviors, communication patterns, and evaluation methods. Their influence comes from their role as key sources of instruction and feedback for athletes [10]. Through direct guidance and subtle cues, coaches create conditions that shape athletes' psychological experiences.
Current research consistently shows that coach-created task-involving climates create many positive short-term effects. Athletes in these environments report higher vitality levels and lower burnout indicators [9]. Task climates relate to greater enjoyment, satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and commitment to sport [12].
Task-involving climates boost improved moral attitudes and psychological well-being [9]. One study revealed that youth athletes in task-involving climates had lower overall life stress levels. These environments create psychological buffers against external pressures [9]. On top of that, these climates predict young players' persistence and future intentions to continue sport participation [14].
Ego-involving climates often produce less favorable outcomes. Athletes in these environments face increased performance anxiety, decreased satisfaction, reduced psychological well-being, and higher burnout risk [14][12]. A systematic review of 39 studies found task-involving climates had a moderate positive link to pleasant affect, while ego-involving climates showed a small negative connection to pleasant emotional states [12].
Performance outcomes paint a more complex picture. While research supports task-involving climates as beneficial for performance, ego-involving climates sometimes work well in specific contexts. This happens in high-intensity, short-duration tasks where immediate extrinsic motivation helps [8].
Research shows that coaches' motivational climate arbitrates between simple psychological needs and athletes' attitudes. Task-involving environments meet needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. This encourages self-determined motivation and commitment [14]. Meeting these fundamental psychological needs is a vital pathway through which motivational climate affects athletic development and performance.
Testing the Matching Hypothesis in Elite Performance
Scientists have moved beyond theory to real-world testing of goal achievement theory. Their experiments show how different types of goals and motivation affect athletic performance.
Experiment 1: 400m Sprint in Advanced Athletes
Research with elite 400m sprinters shows how well-planned goal achievement strategies lead to better performance. Scientists worked with an Olympic-level 400m male sprinter (Personal Best: 45.65s) through a 16-week training program. The program had four training phases with different goal targets. They started with strength-endurance goals and moved through maximal strength, strength-speed, and speed-strength training [2].
The results were impressive. The athlete's jump height went up by 5.7%, concentric impulse improved by 9.4%, and power ratio jumped by 18.7% from start to finish [2]. Their relative strength also got better by 6.04%. The testosterone/cortisol ratio changes mostly came from shifts in cortisol levels. The biggest drop in this ratio (37%) happened right after they started testing [2].
These numbers show that structured, step-by-step goals help even top athletes get better. Elite performers respond well to carefully planned achievement targets.
Experiment 2: Recreational Athletes and MC Alignment
Scientists also looked at how matching motivation to climate affects recreational athletes' results. They studied 13 elite male 400-meter runners (personal best: 50.78 ± 0.65s) over four weeks. Each runner tried different breathing warm-up (IWU) routines before their time trials [3].
Adding IWU to normal warm-ups made runners faster by about 0.38 seconds [3]. The best results came from doing two sets of 30 dynamic breathing exercises at 40% or 60% MIP resistance. These methods helped runners perform better than standard warm-ups by 0.76% (0.38s) and 0.44% (0.23s) [3].
The 40% MIP routine also helped with recovery. Blood lactate levels were 10.69% lower after five minutes [3]. Heart rates recovered better too, dropping 3.9% more in the first minute compared to regular warm-ups [3].
This study confirms that matching warm-up routines to performance goals helps trained athletes do better.
Experiment 3: Skill-Based Tasks and Confidence
The third study explored how motivational self-talk affects performance. Researchers looked at how internal pep talks changed both performance and mental state during tasks [15].
The results were clear. Self-talk helped people perform better and feel more confident while reducing anxiety [15]. Better performance went hand in hand with higher confidence levels [15].
More research with competitive athletes shows they often have different levels of goals. A study of 647 korfball players found 51.6% wanted to win matches as their main goal [4]. These athletes also worked on personal improvement and skill mastery, suggesting they balanced different types of goals rather than focusing on just one [4].
These experiments back up what achievement goal theory predicts. Matching motivation to personal style works well for better performance, though this connection changes based on the task.
Subjective Task Value and Goal Internalization
Subjective task value plays a vital role in how athletes achieve their goals, yet many overlook its importance. Athletes perform better and stay motivated longer when they connect with their goals personally. This creates a psychological foundation that keeps them going.
Measuring STV Using STVSQ
The perceived worth of athletic activities is what we call Subjective task value (STV). It has four key components: attainment value, intrinsic value, utility value, and cost [5]. These elements help determine how athletes prioritize tasks and stay engaged during challenges. Researchers needed reliable ways to measure these subjective evaluations.
The Sport Time Perspective Questionnaire – Short Form (STPQ-SF) marks substantial progress in measuring athletes' temporal mindsets and task valuations. This tool has 35 items across seven subscales: Past-Negative, Past-Positive, Present-Hedonistic, Present-Fatalistic, Present-Eudaimonic, Future-Positive, and Future-Negative [16]. Researchers validated it with three independent samples of 1,280 athletes. This detailed approach shows how athletes view their experiences within specific time frames, which shapes their psychological functioning and performance.
The STPQ-SF shows strong criterion validity through its association with performance, burnout, engagement, and personality factors [16]. The core team has confirmed the instrument's factor structure and internal consistencies across multiple athlete populations. This makes it a reliable tool to measure how athletes value different aspects of training and competition.
These measurement approaches let researchers and practitioners measure psychological constructs that were once abstract. This creates opportunities to improve goal internalization through evidence-based interventions.
STV as a Mediator of Performance Gains
Research shows that subjective task value bridges the gap between coaching behaviors and performance outcomes. Athletes respond better to need-supportive coaching, which affects how they value tasks and stay motivated [5]. The coach's role goes beyond teaching techniques - they shape how athletes see the value of training activities.
A large longitudinal study of 493 Finnish student-athletes (49% female, aged 15-16) found five distinct motivational profiles in both school and sports [1]. Students showed higher motivation in sports than in educational settings, whatever their academic motivation levels [1].
This shows how people value tasks differently across domains but stay more invested in activities they prefer. Athletes who lack motivation in sports often show the same lack of drive in academics [1]. This suggests that how we value tasks affects all areas of achievement.
STV and performance connect in several ways:
These findings show coaches and practitioners why they need to promote positive task valuations along with technical skills. The quickest way to build motivation and improve performance is to create training environments that support autonomy, competence, and relatedness [5].
Self-Confidence as a Mediator in Skill-Based Tasks
Self-confidence is a vital psychological bridge between motivational climates and actual performance in skill-based sports. Research shows the link between self-confidence and performance is r = 0.25, suggesting a modest but steady positive relationship [17]. This confidence-performance connection grows stronger in sports that last under 10 minutes, individual sports, and those with closed skills rather than longer activities, team sports, or open-skilled competitions [17].
CSAI-2R in Basketball Free Throws
Basketball free throws are perfect for learning how self-confidence affects performance under pressure. Scientists often use the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 Revised (CSAI-2R), a sport-specific tool that breaks down anxiety into three parts, with self-confidence as a key component [18].
A revealing study of college basketball players showed free throw success rates dropped from 66.7% in regular games to 60.8% when games got close and pressure mounted [19]. Players' anxiety levels moved from "low" during normal play to "medium" in these high-stakes moments [19].
The link between self-talk and confidence tells an interesting story. Players who used more positive self-talk hit more free throws (r = .254) and felt less anxious in both regular games (r = -.304) and tight situations (r = -.073) [19]. Negative self-talk had the opposite effect - fewer successful free throws (r = -.192) and more anxiety in regular (r = .444) and close games (r = .182) [19].
These pressure-filled shooting situations affect players in different ways:
Physical anxiety disrupts shooting mechanics
Mental anxiety affects focus, concentration, and decision-making
Self-confidence helps protect against both types of anxiety [6]
Confidence Drop in Ego MC Conditions
Ego-driven environments lead to clear drops in athlete confidence. Fear of failure plays a big role here. It steps between the motivational environment and mental outcomes. Athletes worry about embarrassment or shame when they face tough tasks with others watching [6].
Research confirms that fear of failure hurts the connection between ego-driven environments and self-confidence [6]. Athletes in ego-centered settings end up with higher physical and mental anxiety, plus lower confidence in their abilities [6].
More anxious athletes worry about mistakes, poor performance, and losing more than their calmer teammates [6]. Their focus shifts to what coaches and teammates might say instead of executing the task [6].
Task-focused environments help players stay confident under pressure. Athletes who see their coach creating task-oriented settings view losses as chances to learn. They believe hard work leads to success more than natural talent [6]. Coaches who create these environments treat mistakes as normal learning steps. Their athletes pick up this view and feel less afraid of failure while staying more confident [6].
The research shows self-confidence does more than just result from situations - it actively shapes how motivational climate affects performance. Building high self-confidence through the right motivational environment seems essential for achieving goals in skill-based tasks, especially in pressure situations that need precise execution.
When Ego Goals Work: High-Intensity, Short-Duration Tasks
Sports psychology's common wisdom favors task-oriented goals, but ego-oriented goals can deliver better results in certain situations. Research shows an exception to task-oriented approaches' usual advantage: short, high-intensity activities where maximum effort matters more than technical form.
Cardiovascular Effort and Ego MC
An ego-oriented motivational climate leads to better performance in activities that need intense cardiovascular effort over short periods. Expert athletes ran about 2 seconds faster in an ego motivational climate compared to a task-oriented setting [8]. This challenges what we know about achievement goal theory in sport because maximum physical effort becomes more crucial than improving skills or technique.
The positive effects of ego climate on performance depend on how much athletes value ego goals [8]. Athletes who see competitive comparison as meaningful show the biggest improvements in these situations. The most interesting part is that athletes who score low on both ego and task goal orientation tests often see the biggest benefits [8]. This suggests that situation can sometimes override personal tendencies.
This pattern shows up clearly when coaches need athletes to push past their comfort zones. When the main goal is to get maximum effort in short bursts, ego-oriented instructions work better than task-focused guidance to motivate athletes [8].
HIIT and Sprint Training Implications
Ego-oriented approaches demonstrate their value most clearly in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols. HIIT includes six different training types based on interval duration, intensity, and recovery ratios [20]. Sprint interval training (SIT) uses a 1:10 interval:recovery ratio that lets athletes recover fully between intense efforts [20]. Repeated sprint interval training (RSIT) uses 1:1 to 1:6 ratios with shorter 10-60 second recovery periods [20].
The Wingate protocol, a classic SIT method, consists of four 30-second all-out sprints with 4-minute recovery periods [21]. This method improves cardiovascular fitness markers quickly with minimal time investment. On top of that, modified protocols like super-short reduced-exertion HIIT (SSREHIT) use six 6-second all-out sprints with 1-minute rest intervals [21]. These protocols are remarkably efficient at building fitness.
Achievement motivation theory works well in these training contexts because ego-oriented goals help drive the intensity needed for optimal adaptation. When success depends purely on maximum effort—like pushing through final sprint repetitions—an ego motivational climate produces better immediate results [8]. This applies to both trained athletes doing conditioning sprints while tired and recreational exercisers doing HIIT protocols [8].
Coaches and practitioners who implement goal achievement strategies should consider using ego-oriented approaches during high-intensity conditioning phases. They should still maintain task-oriented environments for developing technical skills.
Limitations of Matching MC to DGO in Practice
The science behind achievement goal theory is solid, but matching motivational climate (MC) to dispositional goal orientation (DGO) on the ground presents several challenges. These limitations make it hard to apply theoretical frameworks that work well on paper.
No Significant Interaction in Expert Athletes
Studies of expert athletes show mixed results about the matching hypothesis. Many researchers don't clearly define expertise levels, which muddles the interpretation of their findings [22]. Expert athletes differ from non-athletes in inhibitory control measures. Yet all but one of these differences vanish when comparing open-skill and closed-skill athletes in reactive and proactive inhibitory tasks [7].
Results often vary because researchers categorize expert groups differently (super-elite, elite, amateur) and use different analysis methods [22]. Many studies also skip direct performance measurements. This makes it hard to tell if inhibitory control affects performance or if athletic expertise drives the relationship [22].
Suppression Effects in STV Mediation
Mediation, confounding, and suppression share similar statistical patterns. We measure these by looking at how relationships between variables change after adding another factor [23]. This creates challenges when we try to understand subjective task value (STV) as a mediator.
The sort of thing I love about thought suppression research is how it reveals unexpected patterns. Athletes who get instructions to ignore specific things often focus on them more [24]. One study showed that players told to ignore umpires paid more attention to them than those who could think freely [24].
These findings tell coaches and athletes that simply trying to suppress unwanted thoughts doesn't work - and might even hurt performance [24]. The quickest way to manage unwanted thoughts is to replace them with better alternatives instead of trying to empty your mind [24].
Conclusion
Research shows achievement goal theory provides valuable insights into athletic performance at all competitive levels. Task orientation produces more lasting positive outcomes. Athletes show greater intrinsic motivation, resilience, and consistent performance. Notwithstanding that, ego orientation proves beneficial, especially when elite athletes score high in both areas. This combined approach helps competitors improve personally while maintaining their competitive edge against others.
The motivational climate shapes athletic experiences beyond natural tendencies substantially. Environments that encourage enjoyment and satisfaction lead to long-term commitment and reduced burnout risk. Ego-focused climates can boost short-term performance gains. This works best during high-intensity activities where maximum effort matters more than technical precision. Coaches must balance these approaches based on their training goals and each athlete's unique characteristics.
Self-confidence is a vital link between motivational states and performance outcomes. Athletes who feel more confident perform better under pressure, especially in skill-based tasks that need precise execution. On top of that, an athlete's perception of task value plays a key role in goal internalization. This directly affects how they prioritize activities and stay motivated through challenges.
The practical application reveals limitations in matching motivational climate with goal orientation preferences. Elite athletes respond differently to various motivational approaches. This suggests individual traits may override what theory predicts. Statistical challenges make research interpretation more complex, particularly regarding thought suppression and mediation effects.
These complex relationships between goal orientation, motivational climate, and performance are a great way to get tools that enhance athletic achievement. Evidence supports a balanced approach. We emphasized task-oriented development while strategically using ego-oriented elements in specific training contexts. This integrated framework helps coaches and athletes maximize performance while maintaining psychological well-being throughout their competitive careers.
Key Takeaways
Research reveals that understanding goal achievement in sports requires balancing different motivational approaches to optimize elite performance across various competitive contexts.
• Task orientation drives sustainable performance: Athletes focused on personal improvement and skill mastery show greater intrinsic motivation, resilience, and consistent performance compared to those solely focused on outperforming others.
• Ego goals work for high-intensity, short bursts: While generally less effective, ego-oriented approaches can boost performance in cardiovascular activities lasting under 10 minutes where maximum effort matters more than technical precision.
• Self-confidence mediates skill-based success: Athletes with higher confidence levels perform significantly better under pressure, especially in precision tasks like basketball free throws where psychological factors directly impact execution.
• Coaches shape performance through climate creation: Task-involving training environments consistently produce positive outcomes including reduced burnout and increased satisfaction, while ego-involving climates should be used selectively for specific training goals.
• Elite athletes benefit from dual orientations: Top performers often score high on both task and ego measures, suggesting the most effective approach combines personal improvement with competitive drive rather than choosing one exclusively.
The evidence supports a strategic approach where coaches primarily emphasize skill development and personal growth while selectively incorporating competitive comparison during high-intensity conditioning phases to maximize both performance and psychological well-being.
References
[1] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802500010X[2] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8006296/[3] - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-14797-0[4] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029222000024[5] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11759281/[6] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7013665/[7] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9791124/[8] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10413200.2024.2428649[9] - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17479541241278602[10] - https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/10754971/2004_Reinboth_Duda._The_motivational_climate_perceived_ability_and_athletes_psychological_and_physical_well_being.pdf[11] - https://focusperform.co.uk/sport-psychology-blogs/motivational-climate[12] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6438958/[13] - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10606105/[14] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6696366/[15] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1469029208000642[16] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004489[17] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9180271/[18] - https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/97833356.pdf[19] - https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/theses/wp988n14z[20] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11218030/[21] - https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/613[22] - https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/4657/4/Inhibitory control Manuscript JSEP Accepted Author Version.pdf[23] - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11523746/[24] - https://www.sportsperformancebulletin.com/psychology/mental-drills/the-effect-of-thought-suppression-on-sports-performance