The Hidden Pattern Behind Elite Athletes: Deliberate Practice in Sport Psychology Supervision
- Dr Paul McCarthy
- Sep 15
- 17 min read
Athletic performance improvement needs more than raw talent and repetition to succeed. Therapists and coaches tend to overestimate their impact - they believe they help 65% more clients than they actually do. This reality check explains why many athletes hit a wall despite training hard for years.
Anders Ericsson's concept of deliberate practice gives athletes a way to break through performance barriers. This approach differs from regular training because it demands intense focus and structure to boost performance. Many people assume skills improve with experience, but therapist performance usually gets better only in the first few months after qualification. After that, it either stays flat or drops slightly. Research proves that grit and deliberate practice can substantially predict how elite athletes develop their skills. In this piece, we'll look at how sport psychology supervision can combine deliberate practice principles to revolutionize athletic performance. This could help overcome the stagnation that has kept outcomes mostly unchanged in the last 50 years.
Why Most Athletes Plateau Despite Years of Training
Athletes often hit a wall in their performance despite years of dedicated training. The reality of athletic plateaus isn't random—it comes from deep-rooted issues in traditional training methods that don't promote steady improvement in a well-thought-out and positive way.
Lack of feedback loops in traditional coaching
Effective feedback systems are the life-blood of athletic development, but traditional coaching methods don't measure up in this vital area. The numbers tell a surprising story: coaches and athletes can only remember about 30% of performance accurately [1]. This huge gap between what people think happened and what really occurred creates a real barrier to getting better.
Quality instruction is a vital part of reaching peak sporting performance. A coach's most important job is to give feedback about how skills are performed, which has proven to improve and teach motor skills [2]. All the same, many coaches give vague, general feedback that doesn't target specific areas to improve.
Verbal cues make tasks easier by showing important form elements and improve focus [2]. Yet many coaches stick to positive but non-specific praise instead of clear technical guidance. This might help motivation short-term but doesn't fix the real performance issues.
"Inspect and adapt" should be at the heart of coaching—you need to check progress regularly and make smart changes based on what you see [2]. Without this methodical approach to feedback, athletes keep repeating ineffective patterns that hold them back instead of pushing them forward.
Overreliance on experience without performance tracking
The second reason athletes plateau is trusting experience blindly without data to confirm progress. This creates several issues:
Imbalanced training: Athletes often focus too much on certain training aspects while ignoring others, which leads to getting stuck [3]. Without tracking performance, these gaps stay hidden.
Adaptation without progression: The body gets used to regular training patterns, and results start to drop [4]. Without clear performance metrics, athletes stick to workouts long after they stop working.
Insufficient recovery monitoring: Not giving your body enough rest can stop progress cold [3]. Without keeping tabs on recovery metrics, athletes miss how rest affects their performance.
Mental barriers: Self-doubt and frustration grow stronger when progress stops [5]. These mental blocks become bigger problems when there's no solid data to fight negative thoughts.
Performance tracking systems offer a way out by showing real performance data that reveals when athletes improve or need help [6]. These systems help coaches and athletes understand performance through detailed numbers and reports, taking the guesswork out of training decisions.
Ignoring signs you're stuck leads to frustration, burnout, or injury [7]. The plateau itself isn't bad—it's your body's way of saying it needs a new challenge, showing that your current methods have reached their limit.
Athletes need to think over their practice methods and use objective feedback with performance tracking to break through plateaus. This turns training from just going through the motions into a clear process: find weak spots, make specific fixes, and measure progress against solid standards.
Understanding Deliberate Practice Through Ericsson’s Lens
Anders Ericsson's pioneering work has changed how we understand expertise development in sports psychology and other fields. His research provides a well-laid-out framework that goes beyond simple repetition and shows the quickest way to practice effectively.
Key principles from Anders Ericsson's research
Deliberate practice is a unique approach to skill development that's nowhere near conventional training methods. Ericsson's research shows that deliberate practice must include several essential elements that set it apart from routine practice:
Deliberate practice needs your complete attention and conscious effort—you can't do it automatically or comfortably. This practice just needs total concentration and pushes you past your current abilities. Regular practice might be fun, but deliberate practice challenges you and drains you mentally.
The practice depends on quick, detailed feedback. Ericsson stressed that improvement stops without specific performance feedback. Athletes need to know exactly what aspects of their performance need work, not just whether they did something right or wrong.
Your practice goals should be specific and clear instead of vague ideas like "getting better." These goals should target specific performance aspects that need improvement. To name just one example, a basketball player might work specifically on elbow position or follow-through motion instead of practicing general free throws.
Expert guidance from coaches who understand skill development progression plays a crucial role. These mentors create training activities that match your current skill level and help identify your next development steps.
On top of that, deliberate practice uses systematic methods to find and fix weaknesses. Elite performers don't just practice what they're good at—they tackle their limitations head-on with targeted exercises.
Ericsson discovered that practice quality matters more than quantity. His research challenged the popular "10,000-hour rule." He showed that expert status depends on how you practice, not just how long. Ten thousand hours of mindless repetition gives you very different results than the same time spent practicing deliberately and positively.
Is deliberate a positive word in performance psychology?
"Deliberate" has complex meanings in performance psychology. The word suggests intentionality, thoughtfulness, and strategic planning—all positive traits in athletic development. However, it can also suggest overthinking or mechanical performance that lacks spontaneity.
Elite sports view deliberate practice differently based on context. Athletes respond positively when they understand that being deliberate leads to automatic performance rather than staying permanent. The original deliberate focus on technique eventually becomes fluid, unconscious execution during competition.
Psychologists view deliberate practice positively because it strengthens agency and control. Athletes gain confidence by improving deliberately and positively, knowing they follow a structured, evidence-based path instead of waiting for random breakthroughs.
Research shows that deliberateness helps achievement when balanced with competition spontaneity. Elite performers describe their practice as highly deliberate while their competition performance feels automatic—showing that deliberateness helps development rather than being the end goal.
Words matter in coaching. Calling practice "deliberate" instead of "hard" or "difficult" focuses on purpose and intention rather than just effort. This small language difference helps athletes understand that thoughtful approach matters more than physical effort alone.
Deliberate practice might seem like overthinking or rigidity at first. However, performance psychology sees it as a positive framework that helps athletes improve systematically rather than leaving their growth to chance or talent.
How Sport Psychology Supervision Adopts Deliberate Practice
Sport psychology supervision bridges theoretical knowledge and practical application. It changes how athletes develop mental skills in a deliberate and positive way. This specialized guidance system uses core principles of considered practice through structured feedback loops and systematic skill development frameworks.
Role of supervision in skill development
Sport psychology supervision is the life-blood of skill development. It does more than just oversee progress. The system protects client welfare and promotes practitioner growth [8]. This dual-purpose approach reflects considered practice principles. It maintains high standards and supports continuous improvement.
Good supervision creates a structured environment. Sport psychology practitioners can build expertise through guided experience. The recommended ratio is one hour of face-to-face supervision for every ten to fifteen hours of practice [8]. This time allocation helps practitioners get proper guidance without depending too much on supervisors.
Research on considered practice shows supervision boosts professional growth through connected mechanisms:
Self-assessment and observation
Evaluation and targeted feedback
Knowledge and skill acquisition
Development of practitioner self-efficacy [9]
These elements match Anders Ericsson's framework for considered practice. The framework highlights structured activities designed to improve performance. Yes, it is true that supervision relationships set clear expectations and timeframes. This creates accountability that drives considered development [8].
Studies show supervision content balances service delivery processes with supervisee-focused issues [9]. Practitioners learn to develop case formulation skills—critical for applying theoretical knowledge to real-life situations. Supervisors help trainees connect theory to practice through considered case understanding.
Feedback-informed supervision models
Feedback is central to supervision models that use considered practice principles. Research shows immediate feedback from expert coaches watching closely helps improvement most [10]. Quick correction of flaws helps achieve optimal skill execution.
Several feedback-informed supervision frameworks exist specifically for sport psychology. These models use a feedback loop driven by supervisor and supervisee questions [8]. This ongoing dialog creates conditions for considered practice. Practitioners receive timely information about their performance.
The Skill Training Communication Model shows how supervision can apply considered practice principles. This framework helps practitioners understand when, why, and how to share information during coaching interventions [11]. The model enables supervisors to make sound teaching decisions about feedback timing and content.
Guided self-reflection offers another powerful supervision approach matching considered practice. This method goes beyond traditional teaching. Practitioners learn to look at their own performance critically [9]. Supervisors then guide them to find specific areas needing improvement.
Studies suggest supervision works better with concrete ways to measure learning. Recent research shows we need to look at retention over time rather than single-session performance [12]. Effective supervision models track performance changes across multiple sessions.
These structured approaches make sport psychology supervision embody considered practice. They create environments where practitioners can find weaknesses systematically. They can implement corrections and measure progress against clear targets. This training system builds expertise in a deliberate and positive way instead of just accumulating experience.
Breaking Down the Core Components of Deliberate Practice
A well-laid-out framework that goes beyond casual training helps you think over practice methods. Athletes and coaches who work together in a deliberate and positive way can turn ordinary training into precise skill development. Let's get into four core components that make practice work for elite performance.
1. Identifying performance gaps
The foundation starts with measuring the gap between current and desired performance levels. GAP analysis (Goal, Assessment, and Plan) creates a roadmap to targeted improvement [13]. This process looks at both results and underlying processes, unlike traditional evaluations that only focus on outcomes.
Studies show coaches and athletes only remember 30% of performance correctly [14]. Objective assessment tools are vital to get accurate evaluations. These tools must assess dysfunction in standardized movements and spot differences in how athletes execute these movements [3].
Performance analysis is a specialist discipline with systematic observations to improve performance through objective statistical data and visual feedback [7]. This method helps coaches model what it takes to win and measure where athletes stand [14].
To name just one example, a performance gap could be the 26W difference between an athlete's current 20-minute power and their goal power [13]. A full picture often reveals systemic problems, like an underperforming oxidative energy system compared to the glycolytic system [13].
2. Setting specific learning goals
After spotting performance gaps, you need to turn these analytical insights into specific, measurable learning objectives. A well-laid-out goal system acts as a cognitive motivator that shapes athletes' thinking and behavior [15].
Effective goals in practice must be:
Specific and observable in measurable terms rather than general improvements
Time-bound with clearly identified constraints
Moderately difficult to push athletes without overwhelming them
Written down with regular progress monitoring [16]
Research shows goal setting can substantially improve athletic performance by boosting motivation and focus [15]. The SMART framework (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-bound) works especially well to give athletes clear, structured objectives [15].
Athletes should internalize goals before implementation. They take more ownership when they set their own goals [16]. A clear strategy to achieve these goals helps turn intentions into actions [16].
3. Behavioral rehearsal with feedback
The third component centers on guided repetition with immediate feedback. Research shows verbal cueing aids performance by showing key form characteristics and improves attention [2].
Feedback comes in two main forms:
Knowledge of Results (KR): Information about outcomes like scores or times
Knowledge of Performance (KP): Feedback about form and technique [17]
Coaches should emphasize KP over KR in practice [17]. This lines up with Anders Ericsson's research on practice, which prioritizes technique development over outcome-focused training.
Studies prove that mixing encouragement with corrective feedback helps athletes improve while building confidence [2]. Note that summary feedback every five trials works best in skill acquisition protocols [2].
4. Ongoing performance assessment
The final piece involves tracking progress through continuous assessment. Research confirms that assessment score changes above three points usually show "real" change instead of measurement error [3].
Performance analysis captures, codes, analyzes, and delivers feedback for immediate performance benefits [7]. This cycle ensures training stays focused on identified gaps and goals.
Good assessment systems should measure both submaximal and maximal performance metrics. Lactate threshold tests offer two benefits: they provide objective physiological data that depends less on psychology than maximal power tests, and they don't need exhaustive efforts [13].
These four connected components turn practice from theory into practical methodology. Athletes can improve in a deliberate and positive way instead of just repeating exercises or gaining experience.
Case Example: Applying DP in Elite Athlete Mental Training
Let's get into how athletes turn practice theory into real-life application through a ground case of an elite athlete's mental training program. This example shows how sport psychology supervision brings practice principles to life in a deliberate and positive way with high-performance competitors.
Supervision structure for a high-performance athlete
Elite athletes need a well-laid-out framework that gives quick feedback and builds specific skills. Research shows sport psychologists help manage coach-athlete conflicts, communication issues, money matters, media pressure, and sponsor duties [18]. Their complex role needs a supervision plan that tackles both performance psychology and team dynamics.
A practical supervision model for elite athletes has:
This plan lines up with Anders Ericsson's practice framework. It creates a space where athletes develop mental skills systematically instead of by chance. Supervisors become "cultural architects" who promote safe psychological environments while teaching specific mental techniques [18].
A high-performance gymnast shows this approach in action. During beam routines, they might say "spot" out loud to keep focused during turns [1]. This simple technique shows structured practice at work—a targeted activity that gives immediate feedback.
Tracking mental resilience and focus under pressure
Mental resilience—knowing how to bounce back or adapt after setbacks [6]—shows how practice principles create real results. Elite athletes face unique challenges like competition pressure, intense training, career changes, and mental effects of overtraining [18].
Research points to effective ways to track and build resilience:
Athletes need structured assessments that see resilience as an ongoing process, not a fixed trait [6]. These tools track how athletes think, feel, and act when facing sports challenges [6].
They also watch for warning signs of dropping psychological resilience [19]. Studies prove that longer recovery times often signal an upcoming mental breakdown [19].
Research about focus under pressure reveals something surprising. Expert athletes think more about performance worries than body movements [20]. This finding emphasizes why practice must work on mental skills alongside physical ones.
The A-R-C Development Model helps build resilience by tracking three things: triggers, responses, and results [5]. This approach charts each athlete's progress without using the same plan for everyone [5].
Smart practice for mental skills pays off big time. Studies prove athletes who build strengths like good personality, drive, confidence, focus, and support networks show better psychological resilience [19]. Building these qualities helps athletes perform well under elite competition's intense pressure.
Barriers to Implementing DP in Sport Psychology
Expert practitioners know deliberate practice works, yet its application in sport psychology faces major hurdles. Teams and coaches understand the value of working in a deliberate and positive way, but real-life constraints often block the use of Anders Ericsson's methodology in elite sports.
Time and resource constraints in elite settings
Elite athletes must work within strict time schedules due to multiple competing needs. Their coaches need to direct activities around seasonal organization, training blocks, institute schedules, and unpredictable athletic progress [4]. Athletes struggle to balance their sporting duties with personal growth because of these time restrictions.
Elite athletes work out twice daily, five or six days each week. They also need to:
Handle school work alongside sports training
Rest enough between workouts
Meet media and sponsor duties
Keep up with family and personal life [21]
These time pressures often derail the use of deliberate practice principles. Physical training gets priority in scheduling, while mental skills development gets whatever time is left—if any at all.
Resource distribution creates another big barrier beyond time limits. Research shows elite settings give much less attention and priority to mental health support compared to physical health [22]. Many athletes don't know about mental health services they could use, leaving them without help during tough times [23]. This imbalance goes against deliberate practice principles that need regular expert guidance and feedback.
Money problems make these issues worse, as many organizations can't afford complete psychological support [22]. Many elite sports environments don't have sport psychologists or mental health experts, showing how mental performance gets undervalued [22].
Emotional discomfort with performance review
Mental roadblocks pose challenges equal to practical limits when using deliberate practice in a deliberate and positive way. Athletes and organizations find it hard to deal with the emotional stress that comes from reviewing performance.
Sports culture labels mental health concerns as weakness, creating barriers for those seeking help [23]. Athletes feel embarrassed, proud, scared, and ashamed about getting mental health support [23]. This mindset clashes with the open feedback needed for deliberate practice to work.
Career worries stop athletes from engaging in psychological performance reviews. They worry that sharing could hurt their careers through missed team selections, lost contract renewals, and fewer advertising chances [23]. These fears create defensive attitudes instead of the growth mindset Anders Ericsson's ideal learning environment needs.
Public opinion makes these emotional barriers worse, as athletes worry about others judging them for seeking psychological help [22]. People think psychological support helps only those who are "broken" rather than seeing it as performance enhancement, which creates more resistance [22].
Current psychological support focuses on helping athletes who already have problems rather than building ongoing mental skills through deliberate practice [23]. This reactive approach differs from the proactive, continuous improvement model that makes deliberate practice effective.
Simplified Models: Making DP More Accessible to Practitioners
Traditional practice models often seem hard to apply in real-life settings. Simple innovative frameworks help practitioners adopt Anders Ericsson's principles in a deliberate and positive way without losing effectiveness.
Gamified supervision frameworks
Sport psychology becomes more engaging and available when gamification comes into play. Effective gamified frameworks prioritize datafication and turn abstract performance elements into trackable metrics [24]. Athletes respond well to extrinsic rewards like badges, leaderboards, and intensity scores that boost motivation during the first engagement phases.
Research shows specific game elements work better than others based on athlete responses. Instant feedback during workouts, progress bars showing completion status, earned rewards for specific achievements, and appointment dynamics substantially affect participant motivation [24]. Appointment dynamics emerged as the most positively received gamification element. These dynamics employ recurring schedules where athletes must take specific actions to reach desired outcomes.
Most sport apps use simple interfaces during activity tracking and show only vital data like speed, distance, and location [24]. These systems give detailed feedback through experience points, achievement trophies, and personalized measurements after workouts. They highlight key performance aspects such as fastest segments or personal records.
Peer-based feedback and group rehearsal
Peer-assisted learning (PAL) offers a powerful way to make practice more available. This teaching tool creates mutual educational benefits as both teachers and learners develop skills together [25]. Research shows 31% of athletic training students ask peers for advice more than half the time [25].
Benefits of peer-based approaches include:
Less anxiety when working with peers compared to clinical instructors
Better communication skills
Higher cognitive and psychomotor improvement scores
More confidence in clinical skills and decision making
Better organizational abilities [25]
Peer monitoring creates a natural supportive environment for practice when students identify and provide feedback about appropriate behaviors [25]. Peer assessment helps improve understanding and skill performance, and prepares future practitioners to become clinical instructors [26].
Students might see peer interactions as competitive rather than collaborative. However, most feel less anxious and more self-confident when practicing with peers [25]. This relaxed learning environment helps create the deliberate discomfort needed for growth while keeping psychological safety intact.
Peer-assisted learning fits well with existing supervision structures that recommend an 8:1 student-to-instructor ratio [25]. Clinical rotations where several students work together make this approach easy to implement.
Depth vs Breadth: Should DP Be for All or a Few?
Research shows that thinking over practice principles raises a vital question: should we adopt this demanding approach for everyone or just select athletes? The answer depends on personality, sport type, and individual development stage.
Is a deliberate person a positive connotation in elite sport?
Athletes who think over their actions in elite sports face both benefits and challenges. Of course, these athletes show intense dedication to self-improvement that speeds up their development [10]. This approach works best with specific personality traits that not all athletes naturally have.
Research highlights several key traits shared by athletes who excel at thoughtful practice:
Self-motivation noticeable from an early age
High-learnability (knowing how to learn and progress quickly)
Inbuilt high tolerance to fatigue
Competitive mindset
Emotional stability [27]
We found that forced thoughtful practice often backfires. Athletes feel frustrated, burnt out, and might quit the sport [10]. This suggests that the drive to be deliberate should come from within rather than outside pressure.
Balancing standardization with deep learning
Thoughtful practice shows different results across sports. Studies suggest it works better for highly coordinative esthetic sports like gymnastics but proves nowhere near as effective for endurance, power, and combat sports [27]. This points to the need for sport-specific changes rather than using one approach for everyone.
The most surprising finding comes from meta-analysis research. It challenges what we know about thoughtful practice's effects. While it explains 18% of overall variance in sports performance, it accounts for just 1% of performance variance among elite athletes [28]. This contradicts claims that thoughtful practice alone creates excellence at top levels.
Most performers start effective long-term thoughtful practice when they feel ready—based on their passion for the sport and belief in their advanced abilities [10]. Reaching expertise takes patience through about 10 years of continuous thoughtful practice [10].
Athletes perform best when their practice style matches their natural tendencies and development stage. This suggests we should adjust the depth of implementation based on individual factors rather than prescribing it universally.
Conclusion
Athletes who think over their practice can transform their performance and break through plateaus. Sport psychology supervision can blend Anders Ericsson's principles to create structured improvement pathways instead of leaving development to chance. The difference between traditional training and thinking over practice explains why many athletes stay stuck despite years of hard work.
Four core components shape the foundation to work effectively - identifying performance gaps, setting specific learning goals, behavioral rehearsal with feedback, and ongoing assessment. These elements create a system that turns vague hopes into measurable progress when applied properly. On top of that, feedback-informed supervision models give sport psychologists practical frameworks they can use with their athletes.
Notwithstanding that, real-life implementation faces most important challenges. Time constraints, limited resources, and emotional discomfort with performance review create big barriers. The simpler models we discussed earlier provide budget-friendly solutions that keep the core of thinking over practice while making it more available and engaging.
This piece expresses that thinking over practice needs thoughtful application rather than universal prescription. Studies show different levels of success across sports and personality types, which suggests the need for custom approaches. Yes, it is true that the athlete who thinks over practice may develop faster, though this path works best when it lines up with natural tendencies and readiness for growth.
Sport psychology supervision should create safe spaces where athletes accept the discomfort needed for growth. New frameworks with games and peer feedback systems could make thinking over practice both effective and fun.
The secret to elite performance becomes clear - excellence rarely comes from just experience. Instead, it grows in structured environments rich with feedback that target specific improvements in a positive way. Sport psychology supervision provides the framework that helps athletes turn their potential into exceptional performance.
Key Takeaways
Understanding how elite athletes break through performance plateaus requires moving beyond traditional training to embrace deliberate practice principles in sport psychology supervision.
• Most athletes plateau because coaches recall only 30% of performance correctly - Traditional training lacks specific feedback loops and objective performance tracking needed for continuous improvement.
• Deliberate practice requires four core components: identifying performance gaps, setting specific learning goals, behavioral rehearsal with immediate feedback, and ongoing performance assessment.
• Sport psychology supervision transforms mental training by applying structured feedback systems and expert guidance, creating environments where athletes develop skills systematically rather than through experience alone.
• Implementation faces real barriers including time constraints in elite settings and emotional discomfort with performance review, requiring simplified models like gamification and peer feedback systems.
• Deliberate practice isn't universally effective - Research shows it works best for coordinative sports and athletes with specific personality traits, suggesting customized approaches rather than one-size-fits-all implementation.
The hidden pattern behind elite performance isn't talent or hours alone—it's the systematic application of deliberate practice principles through structured supervision that transforms potential into exceptional results.
References
[1] - https://www.innerdrive.co.uk/blog/deliberate-practice-athletes/[2] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3761887/[3] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4275191/[4] - https://insep.hal.science/hal-01713590/document[5] - https://www.port.ac.uk/news-events-and-blogs/news/whats-the-secret-to-building-resilience-in-elite-sports[6] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9811683/[7] - https://uksportsinstitute.co.uk/service/performance-analysis/[8] - https://www.apadivisions.org/division-47/about/resources/supervision[9] - https://issponline.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Competent-supervision-in-sport-psychology-2023-2.pdf[10] - https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/sport-between-the-ears/202409/deliberate-practice-the-key-to-expert-skill-development[11] - https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01444/full[12] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2023.2240630[13] - https://www.trainingpeaks.com/coach-blog/how-coaches-can-use-gap-analyzes-to-guide-training/[14] - http://www.sportni.net/performance/sports-institute-northern-ireland/performance-analysis/[15] - https://optimihealth.ai/is-goal-setting-important-in-sports-training/[16] - https://appliedsportpsych.org/resources/resources-for-athletes/principles-of-effective-goal-setting/[17] - https://www.sportpsychologytoday.com/sport-psychology-for-coaches/feedback-in-athletic-coaching-part-2/[18] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11933008/[19] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2039749[20] - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20425657/[21] - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272522251_Time_management_in_elite_sports_How_do_elite_athletes_manage_time_under_fatigue_and_stress_conditions[22] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10413200.2023.2197962[23] - https://www.drpaulmccarthy.com/post/sport-mental-health-crisis-hidden-barriers-blocking-peak-athletic-performance[24] - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331103642_The_Effect_of_Gamification_in_Sport_Applications[25] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1421493/[26] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2978013/[27] - https://worldrowing.com/2017/11/09/what-makes-champion-deliberate-practice-innate-talent/[28] - https://hhs.purdue.edu/skill-learning-and-performance-lab/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2024/08/macnamara-et-al-2016-the-relationship-between-deliberate-practice-and-performance-in-sports-a-meta-analysis.pdf
