Building CBT Formulations for Psychological Skills Training in Elite Athletes

Dr Paul McCarthy
2 days ago
15 min read

A woman in a black suit and a man in sportswear sit in a bright office, engaged in conversation. Sports photos and a plant in the background. — A business professional and an athlete engage in a focused conversation in a modern office setting, surrounded by motivational sports images.

Research shows that psychological skills training through CBT can reduce performance anxiety by up to 45% while boosting confidence and concentration during competitions. Athletes who practice CBT techniques regularly achieve their goals 20% more often and see notable performance improvements. This piece will guide you through building CBT formulations that work for psychological skills training in sport. We'll cover assessment methods and psychological skills training techniques such as visualization and exposure methods. You'll also learn how to combine these programs smoothly into daily training routines. You'll find practical psychological skills training examples and learn to monitor progress systematically.

Understanding CBT Formulation Framework for Elite Athletes

CBT formulation serves as the organizing principle that transforms scattered assessment data into actionable intervention strategies for athletes. This systematic approach has proven effective because it addresses thoughts, behaviors, and feelings as interconnected elements responding to environmental stimuli ^[1]. The way athletes interpret these three components directly influences sports performance and creates a reciprocal relationship where psychological skills affect physical execution and vice versa ^[1].

Defining CBT Formulation in Sports Psychology Context

Case formulation provides sports psychologists with a structured method to organize assessment information and develop targeted intervention strategies ^[2]. Formulation creates individualized roadmaps based on each athlete's unique psychological landscape rather than applying generic mental training protocols.

The Five Aspects Model breaks down athletic performance into interconnected components: situation, cognition, emotion, physiology, and behavior ^[2]. This framework reveals how different elements interact during competition. To name just one example, an athlete facing a critical penalty kick (situation) might experience thoughts of failure (cognition), which trigger nervousness (emotion) and increased heart rate (physiology) that affect their shooting technique (behavior). Understanding these connections allows me to design interventions that target root causes instead of superficial symptoms ^[2].

CBT interventions achieve results through improvements in cognitive skills such as motivation, mental concentration, and self-confidence, all within the context of specific physical, technical, and tactical training ^[1]. Psychological skills themselves don't lift performance beyond an athlete's potential, but they help athletes reach performance levels as close as possible to their maximum capacity ^[1].

The 5 P's Model: Presenting, Predisposing, Precipitating, Perpetuating, and Protective Factors

The 5 P's framework offers a detailed structure to understand athletic performance challenges:

Presenting Issues represent current difficulties affecting performance. These include performance anxiety, which researchers describe as an unpleasant psychological state in reaction to perceived stress concerning task performance under pressure ^[2]. Athletes might also struggle with concentration lapses, confidence erosion, or technique breakdown during competitions.

Predisposing Factors include past experiences that shape unhelpful thought patterns or create heightened stress responses ^[2]. These historical elements make athletes more vulnerable to current challenges. An athlete who experienced public failure early in their career might develop persistent self-doubt that resurfaces during high-stakes moments.

Precipitating Factors are triggers that activate current issues ^[2]. Athletes face three main stressor types: competitive stressors related to sports performance, organizational stressors with team or coach conflicts, and personal stressors from life events ^[2]. A recent injury, coaching change, or relationship problem can precipitate psychological difficulties.

Perpetuating Factors maintain psychological struggles over time ^[2]. These include responses from others that reinforce distress, unhelpful coping strategies, or negative self-beliefs. Avoidance behaviors receive negative reinforcement because they provide quick relief but worsen anxiety long-term, as athletes never learn to overcome these feelings ^[2].

Protective Factors identify strengths, coping strategies, and positive influences that support resilience ^[2]. These might include supportive teammates, effective pre-performance routines, or past success experiences athletes can draw upon.

This framework helps sports psychologists address mechanisms rather than just symptoms during intervention ^[2].

How Formulations Are Different from Standard Psychological Skills Training Programs

Traditional mental coaching focuses on performance improvement techniques without examining deeper thought patterns and beliefs ^[1]. CBT formulation is different in several fundamental ways. It addresses root causes of mental barriers through structured, evidence-based methodology and incorporates validated assessment tools ^[1].

Standard psychological skills training programs often emphasize positive thinking without challenging the beliefs underneath. CBT goes beyond teaching relaxation or positive self-talk. It helps athletes identify and challenge unhelpful core beliefs by covering every aspect of an athlete's experience: thoughts, emotions, physiology, and behaviors ^[1].

The formulation approach recognizes that different athletes need different psychological approaches and makes tailored interventions more effective than one-size-fits-all programs ^[2]. This personalization stems from the detailed assessment across multiple areas, allowing me to develop intervention strategies targeting specific mechanisms maintaining performance difficulties rather than applying generic skill-building exercises.

Initial Assessment and Behavioral Analysis for Athletes

Assessment turns abstract psychological concepts into measurable data points that guide intervention design. Psychological skills training for athletes becomes guesswork rather than evidence-based practice without well-laid-out assessment. The tools I use establish baselines, identify specific psychological deficits, and reveal patterns that might otherwise remain hidden during coaching observations alone.

Using CPRD Questionnaire for Baseline Psychological Profiling

The Psychological Characteristics Related to Sport Performance Questionnaire (CPRD) stands as one of the most used instruments in Spain to assess psychological abilities related to performance. Built on the Psychological Skills Inventory for Sports foundation, this 55-item assessment uses a 5-point Likert scale with an additional "I do not understand" option to prevent missing responses ^[3].

The CPRD measures five distinct psychological areas. Stress Control gets into how athletes handle potentially stressful situations and competition demands through 20 items with strong internal consistency (α = 0.88) ^[3]. Influence of Performance Assessment looks at athlete reactions to performance judgments from themselves and others across 12 items (α = 0.72) ^[3]. Motivation assesses the drive for sport performance and achievement through 8 items (α = 0.67) ^[3]. Mental Skills assesses the use of various mental techniques for performance across 9 items, though this subscale shows lower internal consistency (α = 0.34) ^[3]. Team Cohesion measures connection and integration within sport groups through 6 items (α = 0.78) ^[3].

The total scale demonstrates good internal consistency (α = 0.85) ^[3]. Research comparing professional and amateur triathletes revealed that professionals scored higher across all psychological dimensions assessed. Stress control showed particularly strong differences (t85 = 3.005, p = 0.003, d = 1.07) ^[4]. This pattern suggests the CPRD distinguishes psychological characteristics across skill levels effectively.

Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI-28) Implementation

The ACSI-28 provides a psychometrically sound approach to assessing athletic coping skills across seven dimensions ^[4]. This 28-item self-report measure works with athletes ages 14 and above. It assesses Coping with Adversity, Peaking Under Pressure, Goal Setting and Mental Preparation, Concentration, Freedom from Worry, Confidence and Achievement Motivation, and Coachability ^[4].

Each subscale generates raw scores between 0 and 12, with total scores ranging from 0 to 84 ^[4]. Higher scores represent greater levels of psychological skills and coping strategies. The assessment presents results as percentile ranks based on normative data from 1,027 male and female athletes, making interpretation straightforward ^[4]. The total scale shows strong internal consistency (α = 0.86) ^[4]. Individual subscales demonstrate good reliability, with coefficients ranging from Concentration (α = 0.62) to Peaking Under Pressure (α = 0.78) ^[4].

Understanding an athlete's ACSI-28 profile informs intervention focus during consultations. Low Concentration scores might indicate the need for attention training, while deficits in Coping with Adversity point toward stress management training benefits ^[4]. Research demonstrates that psychological skills measured by the ACSI-28 can reduce the influence of disparities in physical talent, leveling the playing field ^[4]. The Confidence and Achievement Motivation subscale emerged as the strongest predictor of both batting and pitching performance in professional baseball players ^[4].

Identifying Performance Anxiety and Mental Blocks Through Assessment

Mental blocks represent a disconnect between mind and body, or between conscious and unconscious mind ^[3]. Athletes at all levels experience these blocks, which demonstrate as performance anxiety and fear of executing skills. I look beyond the symptom to the athlete's perception of situations when I assess mental blocks.

Think over a baseball player who strikes out repeatedly to demonstrate this concept. The problem isn't the strikeout itself but his perception of himself after striking out ^[3]. He thinks "I am bad. I am going to upset my coach. What is my dad going to say?" These perceptions control behavior moving forward and create a mental barrier that standard positive self-talk cannot eliminate ^[3].

Fear avoidance in athletes involves avoiding activity due to fear of pain or reinjury, contributing to persistent symptoms, depression, and disability ^[4]. The Athletic Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) assesses this through 10 items scored on a 5-point scale, with total scores ranging from 10 to 50 points ^[4]. Higher scores indicate greater fear avoidance levels. The questionnaire demonstrates good internal consistency (α = 0.805) ^[4].

Research shows that athletic fear avoidance associates with postconcussion symptom severity, mood disturbance, and disability ^[4]. The AFAQ score at initial visits approximates scores seen in athletes with musculoskeletal injury (21.8-26.0 points) ^[4]. Athletic fear avoidance was elevated at the start of rehabilitation and improved over time in most patients. It associated with recovery outcomes ^[4]. Athlete-specific fear avoidance explained 7.3% of the unique variation in physical function, making it the most important factor among demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables examined ^[4].

Creating Hierarchies of Fear and Avoidance Behaviors

Creating hierarchies involves identifying exercises or activities that increase negative emotions and rating them from least to most fearful ^[4]. Athletes rate their stress levels from 0 to 100 during exposure, providing quantifiable data to track progress. This approach allows me to design gradual exposure interventions matched to each athlete's tolerance levels.

The process starts with helping athletes identify triggers that produce distress or avoidance during specific exercises ^[4]. I look for moments when athletes become distressed, avoid movements, or hesitate before certain tasks. These triggers form a ranked hierarchy once identified. Athletes then perform the least feared exercise in a controlled, safe environment and increase speed, repetitions, and difficulty until they perform without worry ^[4].

This method proved effective with a soccer player recovering from an ACL tear who avoided change-of-direction drills ^[4]. Her anxiety spiked when facing dribbling exercises because she feared relapsing. Escaping these situations brought anxiety levels down and acted as negative reinforcement ^[4]. Breaking this contingency required completing enough changes of direction in safe settings to re-assess the perceived danger. Athletes need to perform feared movements repeatedly to realize there was nothing to fear, facilitating extinction of the fear response ^[4].

Building the Formulation: Connecting Assessment to Intervention

Connecting assessment data to intervention strategies requires understanding how thoughts, emotions, and behaviors interact during athletic performance. This formulation process transforms raw scores from CPRD and ACSI-28 into useful psychological skills training programs that address specific performance barriers.

Mapping Cognitive-Emotional-Behavioral Patterns in Competition

Athletes interpret pre-competition emotions differently, and these interpretations matter more than emotional intensity alone. Research with 383 elite athletes revealed three distinct profiles: those with moderate emotional intensity, those viewing all emotions as performance-boosting, and those with low emotional arousal ^[5]. Athletes who perceived emotions as facilitating performance reported higher challenge appraisals, greater perceived control, and more adaptive coping strategies compared to other profiles ^[5].

The directional interpretation of emotions predicts performance more accurately than intensity measurements ^[5]. An athlete experiencing high anxiety might perform well if they interpret nervousness as readiness rather than threat. Athletes who view anxiety as facilitative increase the likelihood of a challenge state as they approach competition ^[5].

Higher control perception and excitement relate to greater intention to use active coping strategies ^[6]. Female athletes practicing individual sports show stronger associations with emotional support usage ^[6]. Lower coping perception combined with higher anger intensity connects to anticipated humor use ^[6]. These patterns inform which psychological skills training techniques will appeal to specific athletes.

Linking Predisposing Factors to Current Performance Issues

Historical factors create vulnerability to current challenges. Injuries stand out as significant predisposing elements associated with depression, anxiety, somatization, and obsessive-compulsive tendencies ^[7]. The prolonged rehabilitation process and recurrent injury risk contribute to heightened psychological stress ^[7].

Athletic level and training history also shape psychological responses. High-level athletes demonstrate improved resilience and coping abilities, consistent with self-determination theory's emphasis on intrinsic motivation protecting psychological well-being ^[7]. Athletes with longer training histories show lower anxiety levels and reduced interpersonal sensitivity, likely due to resilient social networks and accumulated experience managing competitive pressures ^[7].

Psychological stress may contribute to conditions like low energy availability through behaviors such as restrictive eating and excessive exercise adopted as coping mechanisms ^[3]. Athletes may understand the detrimental health implications yet simultaneously desire to maintain a lean physique, creating internal conflict that undermines recovery efforts ^[3].

Establishing Perpetuating Cycles in Athletic Performance

Negative thought patterns sustain performance difficulties. Athletes experiencing shame after poor performances often participate in avoidance behaviors like skipping practices, which intensifies inadequacy feelings and perpetuates the cycle ^[3]. Research indicates 65% of athletes reported embarrassment after poor performances ^[3]. Athletes experiencing high shame levels are 40% more likely to suffer from stress-related illnesses ^[3].

Maladaptive cognitions prompt negative emotions that hinder recovery progress. Athletes describe relapsing into unhealthy behaviors attempting to reduce emotional discomfort ^[3]. Negative expectations and overgeneralizations keep athletes stuck in cycles where they predict losses, then use losses as evidence supporting pessimistic predictions ^[2].

Identifying Protective Factors and Existing Strengths

Resilience represents a vital protective factor. Young people participating in sports activities demonstrate substantially greater resilience than non-participants, with higher-level competitors showing improved resilience ^[8]. Boldness, higher athletic level, and longer training years act as protective factors against mental disorders ^[7]. Intrinsic motivation, where individuals mobilize resources for personal satisfaction and task enjoyment, links to higher positive coping abilities ^[8]. Female athletes tend to show elevated self-compassion levels, promoting positive self-evaluations and reducing distress ^[2]. Autonomy, positive relations in sport and private life, and adequate recovery serve as additional protective elements ^[7].

Psychological Skills Training Techniques Within CBT Framework

Psychological skills training techniques within a CBT framework provide athletes with concrete tools to manage performance challenges. These interventions work because they address the interconnected nature of thoughts, emotions, and physical responses during competition.

Visualization and Mental Rehearsal for Skill Execution

Imagery occupies a central place in psychological preparation and represents one of the most accessible tools to more people in sports ^[9]. Athletes who practice visualization can boost muscle coordination by 30% compared to those who don't ^[10]. This technique activates the same neural pathways used during actual performance. It provides extra practice without physical strain ^[4].

Effective imagery incorporates all five senses with emotion and motion ^[10]. Athletes need to see, feel, hear, smell, and taste their performance environment mentally. County-level golfers improved putting performance by 29% using the PETTLEP model, while national-level golfers boosted bunker shots by 8%. This jumped to 22% when combined with physical practice ^[4]. Michael Phelps relied heavily on daily visualization throughout his career, boosting focus and technique retention by approximately 25% ^[4].

Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) for Arousal Control

PMR involves tensing and releasing muscle groups to achieve relaxation ^[5]. Jacobson developed this technique in the 1920s, using both top-down processing from the cerebral cortex and bottom-up proprioceptive stimulation from peripheral muscles ^[5]. Athletes tense each muscle group for 5 seconds while breathing in, then release for 10-20 seconds while breathing out ^[6].

Research demonstrates PMR's effectiveness in a variety of areas. One study involved 49 nursing students who received four 30-minute PMR sessions, resulting in most important test anxiety reduction compared to controls ^[5]. Similarly, 50 hospitalized cancer patients in the PMR group showed anxiety reductions on the Generalized Anxiety Questionnaire ^[5]. PMR decreases arousal to suitable competition levels for athletes while improving sleep quality and cognitive abilities ^[11].

Exposure Methods for Performance Anxiety Management

Exposure therapy introduces athletes to anxiety-provoking situations in controlled environments ^[12]. The brain learns not to fear these scenarios through repeated exposure ^[13]. I start athletes with low-pressure situations before progressing to more stressful environments. This desensitization reduces anxiety intensity over time while deepening coping skills ^[12].

Real-life exposure confronts competitive fears in real situations, breaking avoidance patterns that strengthen anxiety ^[4]. Athletes work through anxiety hierarchies ranking situations by distress levels, building confidence ^[4].

Cognitive Restructuring During Training Sessions

Cognitive restructuring identifies self-defeating thoughts and substitutes them with positive, adaptive statements ^[14]. The process follows four steps: identifying negative thoughts during problematic situations, identifying and rehearsing coping statements, replacing negative statements with coping ones, and rehearsing positively reinforcing statements ^[14]. Young athletes under 20 using this strategy were 6.21 times more likely to feel positive about their performance ^[4].

SMART Goal Setting and Self-Monitoring Systems

SMART goals provide clear structure: Specific objectives rather than vague intentions, Measurable metrics to track progress, Achievable yet challenging targets, Relevant arrangement with broader aspirations, and Time-bound deadlines creating urgency ^[15]. Athletes set two performance goals before competitions, then assess achievement factors afterward ^[16]. This tracking helps athletes maintain focus on improvement processes rather than just outcomes ^[4].

Integrating Formulations into Daily Training Routines

CBT formulations gain value through embedding into athletes' daily training schedules rather than isolated therapy sessions. The integration process requires well-laid-out session planning, coach collaboration, and systematic between-session practice to produce lasting results.

Session Planning: Arousal, Focus, and Confidence Development

Sessions follow a systematic approach that begins with psychoeducation, where I explain core concepts like arousal control, attention management, and confidence building ^[8]. Athletes learn that performance anxiety is common and fixable through evidence-based strategies. After baseline assessment identifies negative thought patterns, I introduce techniques matched to individual needs. Guided practice allows athletes to apply these methods in challenging situations that become progressively more difficult ^[8].

Collaborative Planning Between Psychologists and Coaches

Research shows that 75% of athletes believe mental well-being has a high impact on performance ^[17]. Teams whose coaches use psychological tools see up to 30% better overall performance ^[17]. Treatment needs to work, so I educate coaches and parents (with athlete assent) about the rationale behind interventions, including how avoidance and anxiety relate, so they support rather than hamper progress ^[3]. This cooperative approach creates consistent messaging across all athlete interactions.

Creating Exposure During Practice Sessions

Exposure during sessions involves creating moderately stressful conditions during training to practice coping skills ^[8]. Athletes rate situations on the SUDS scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 100 (extreme anxiety), helping communicate how distressful the exposure might be ^[3]. Starting with moderate anxiety-provoking situations, I increase difficulty based on the anxiety hierarchy. Athletes need repeated exposure to feared emotions and situations to develop new experiences of the true danger present ^[3].

Homework Assignments and Between-Session Practice

Homework assignments are a core CBT component ^[3]. After exposure sessions, athletes receive specific tasks: timed breath-holding exercises, interval training repetitions, or completing feared segments during distance training ^[3]. Daily thought records and mood tracking help identify patterns ^[8]. One athlete lowered anxiety from original levels to 30 on the 0-100 scale through consistent homework practice ^[3].

Monitoring Progress and Adapting Formulations

Tracking outcomes separates effective interventions from hopeful assumptions. Adjustments become guesswork rather than evidence-based decisions without measurement.

Daily Thought Records and Mood Tracking

Thought records capture situations and emotions with intensity ratings. They also record thoughts with belief strength ratings ^[2]. A simple four-column format works well. It covers date, situation, emotion, and thought while fitting busy schedules and producing valuable data ^[2]. Athletes see better results when they record thoughts right after they happen rather than later ^[2]. Daily tracking reveals recurring patterns that might go unnoticed. This helps athletes recognize their negative self-talk triggers ^[2].

SUDS Ratings Help Measure Anxiety Reduction

The Subjective Units of Distress Scale ranges from 0 (no distress) to 100 (extreme distress) ^[7]. Teams get SUDS data at baseline during exposure tasks. They also collect it at intervals during exposure and after completion ^[7]. The goal involves achieving approximately 50% reduction in SUDS ^[7]. Research shows SUDS halved within sessions on average ^[7].

Pre-Post Intervention Comparisons on Stress Metrics

The CPRD demonstrates acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.85) ^[2]. Athletes show notable improvements in Stress Control and Performance Evaluation subscales (p < 0.01) after treatment ^[2].

Correlating Psychological Gains with Competition Results

Pre-Performance Routines show moderate-to-large effects under low-pressure (Hedges' g = 0.64) and pressurized conditions (Hedges' g = 0.70) ^[2]. Athletes with consistent mental routines report 20% higher goal achievement rates ^[2]. Furthermore, 75% note improved performance after incorporating mental training ^[2].

Revising Formulations Based on New Information

Formulations require revision when progress plateaus or new stressors emerge. They also need updates when competition demands change unexpectedly.

Conclusion

Building effective CBT formulations transforms psychological skills training from generic exercises into targeted interventions. The framework I've outlined provides a systematic path from original assessment through intervention design to progress monitoring. Athletes who commit to structured formulations see measurable anxiety reductions and achieve competition goals more consistently.

You should apply these assessment tools with your athletes and develop customized formulations using the 5 P's model. Evidence-based techniques like visualization, exposure therapy, and cognitive restructuring within customized formulations create lasting performance improvements. Your athletes deserve interventions grounded in their unique psychological profiles rather than one-size-fits-all programs.

Initial Meeting, Assessment & Follow-up

£349.00

Book Now

Key Takeaways

CBT formulations provide a systematic, evidence-based approach to psychological skills training that goes beyond generic mental coaching by addressing the unique psychological profile of each elite athlete.

• Use the 5 P's framework (Presenting, Predisposing, Precipitating, Perpetuating, Protective factors) to create individualized intervention strategies rather than applying one-size-fits-all mental training programs.

• Implement structured assessment tools like CPRD and ACSI-28 questionnaires to establish baseline psychological profiles and identify specific performance barriers before designing interventions.

• Integrate evidence-based techniques systematically - combine visualization, progressive muscle relaxation, exposure therapy, and cognitive restructuring within daily training routines for maximum effectiveness.

• Monitor progress with measurable data using SUDS ratings, thought records, and pre-post comparisons to track anxiety reduction and correlate psychological gains with actual competition results.

• Collaborate with coaches and create in-session exposure during practice to ensure consistent messaging and provide athletes with real-world opportunities to apply coping skills under controlled stress.

Research demonstrates that athletes using structured CBT formulations achieve 45% reductions in performance anxiety and reach their goals 20% more often than those using traditional mental training approaches. The key lies in connecting assessment data to targeted interventions that address root causes rather than just symptoms.

References