Athlete Development Stages: New Research Reveals Hidden Growth Patterns
- Dr Paul McCarthy
- 12 minutes ago
- 14 min read
Athlete development stages are changing faster than ever as international sports competition hits new heights, with more than 50 nations now competing at record levels . Traditional models have shaped training methods for decades, but they often miss key growth patterns that show up throughout an athlete's career.
The way we look at lifespan development has revolutionized our grasp of athlete progression, starting from early childhood and continuing into older adulthood . The 7 stages of long-term athlete development create a solid framework. Recent research shows these paths rarely follow a straight line. Sports of all types must consider late bloomers, career shifts, and athletes who return to competition. These hidden patterns matter more as researchers from different fields show growing interest in sport participation .
This piece dives into how experts are reimagining long-term athlete development stages to match the complex reality of athletic careers. We'll look at where traditional models fall short and reveal new research that changes our understanding of athlete development throughout life.
Limitations of Traditional Athlete Development Models
Traditional athlete development models have shaped training methods for decades. These models have guided how we train athletes. Yet they have basic limitations that hold back their ability to work well.
Focus on early specialization in DSMP and LTAD
The Developmental Model of Sport Participation (DSMP) and Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) frameworks put too much weight on early specialization. This often hurts young athletes. Research shows elite athletes typically specialize around age 14, during their early teen years [1]. Individual sports show this trend clearly. Gymnasts start at age 9, dancers at 11, and tennis sees 70% of junior elite players specialized by age 10 and 95% by age 18 [1]. All the same, team sports like baseball and soccer now follow this pattern too.
Many promote early specialization, but growing evidence shows it's not needed to reach elite levels. This approach brings potential risks. Athletes who start early face higher chances of serious overuse injuries and report more previous injuries [1]. Since 2008, sports injuries among children aged 10-14 have jumped 60% - twice the increase of any other age group [1].
Early specialization hurts more than just the body. It leads to psychological strain and burnout [1]. Athletes can fall into what experts call the "comparison trap." Parents and coaches worry too much when kids hit rough patches while their peers keep improving. This often makes athletes quit the sport [2].
Lack of post-elite and older adult representation
Current discussions about athlete development focus mostly on early stages. They don't pay much attention to elite and post-elite periods [3]. Athletes' careers last well beyond their competitive peaks, but traditional models don't help much with transitions out of elite competition or staying active through adulthood.
Canada's Sport for Life framework stands out by including both elite and post-elite stages [3]. This matters more now as Masters sports (international competition for those over 35) reaches new heights, with more than 50 nations taking part [3].
A complete model should show how athletic identity changes during and after competitive careers. Research proves that retirement from sport usually weakens athletic identity, affecting mental well-being [4]. The largest longitudinal study of these identity changes remains rare, leaving a big gap in our understanding of lifelong athlete development [4].
Overemphasis on linear progression
The biggest problem with traditional models is how they show development as a straight, predictable path. Real athlete development isn't simple or linear [2]. It has many ups, downs, and backward steps [2]. Critics say the LTAD framework is too simple and lacks proof to back up its structure [5].
Traditional models treat athletes like similar parts in a machine. They don't account for different backgrounds, motivations, and ways of learning [3]. This one-size-fits-all approach leaves out late bloomers and athletes who succeed in unusual ways [3]. Research shows learning doesn't follow a smooth path but involves sudden changes over time [3].
This rigid system creates what critics call a "factory ethos." Children become interchangeable parts to process, review, and pick based on early performance. Physical differences influence these choices more than long-term potential [5]. On top of that, many organizations say they use integrated development models while picking athletes early - going against basic principles of long-term development [5].
These limitations show we should view athlete development as a nonlinear process. It needs dynamic interactions that fit individual differences and various development paths.
The 7 Stages of Long-Term Athlete Development Revisited
Long-term athlete development (LTAD) models have grown through research and real-life application over time. The 7-stage framework shows what athletes need at specific ages and developmental milestones [6]. Progress through these stages depends on individual development rates rather than just chronological age, since males and females mature differently [3]. Let's get into each stage with the latest research findings.
Stage 1: Active Start (0–6 years)
The Active Start stage puts play and simple movement skills first for children ages 0-6 [7]. This foundation-setting period builds simple movements like crawling and rolling that create vital brain-muscle connections [1]. Physical activity at this time improves brain function, coordination, social skills, gross motor skills, emotions, and imagination [3]. Children don't need structured training. Parents should create chances for physical activity through structured and unstructured free play [7].
Stage 2: FUNdamentals (6–9 years)
Boys aged 6-9 and girls 6-8 learn agility, balance, coordination, and speed—the ABCs of movement [1] in the FUNdamentals stage. Children should join well-laid-out activities that build simple movement skills while having fun [3]. Programs should avoid early specialization that leads to one-sided development and increases injury risk and burnout [1]. Team sports or activities of all types work best at this stage [1].
Stage 3: Learn to Train (8–12 years)
This vital period (girls 8-11, boys 9-12) gives children the best chance to turn simple movement skills into foundational sport skills [1]. The focus changes to learning skills needed for various sporting activities [3]. Formal training methods start now, but participation in 2-3 sports across different seasons works best [1]. Too much single-sport training too soon can hurt later development, particularly in late specialization sports [3].
Stage 4: Train to Train (12–16 years)
The Train to Train stage (girls 11-15, boys 12-16) begins with the adolescent growth spurt [1]. Young athletes respond well to training stimuli during this vital phase—making it perfect to start "building the engine" [3]. Athletes should build an aerobic base, develop speed and strength, and combine sport-specific skills [3]. Physical fitness becomes key, with aerobic, anaerobic, strength and power trainability linked to maturation level [8].
Stage 5: Train to Compete (16–23 years)
Athletes reach this stage after mastering sport-specific training from the previous stage [9]. They focus on one sport (or at most two complementary sports) as training becomes nearly full-time [9]. High-intensity, individual-event and position-specific training happens in a high-quality environment [9]. Athletes learn to perform under various competitive conditions while competing nationally and developing international competition skills [9].
Stage 6: Train to Win (19+ years)
Train to Win represents the peak of high-performance development [6]. Athletes at this level (usually 18+ for females, 19+ for males) become "full-time athletes" with personalized training [1]. They compete internationally using world-class training methods, equipment, and facilities [3]. All physical, technical, tactical, mental, and lifestyle skills come together as performance reaches its peak [10]. Recovery, regeneration, and mental fitness improve through scheduled recovery periods [10].
Stage 7: Active for Life (any age)
Active for Life works both as a stage and outcome of the LTAD model [1]. Athletes can start this stage at any age after learning physical literacy [3]. This path offers three options: Competitive for Life (continued sport participation), Fit for Life (new sports/activities), and Sport and Physical Activity Leaders (coaching/officiating) [4]. This inclusive approach promotes lifelong physical activity whatever your previous competitive level [11].
Hidden Growth Patterns Across the Lifespan
New research reveals complex growth patterns in athletic development that go way beyond the reach and influence of traditional frameworks. These hidden patterns explain why some athletes succeed through unexpected paths that don't match the usual progression from junior to senior levels.
Late bloomers and re-entry athletes
Athletes who develop late face substantial challenges in regular talent identification systems. They receive nowhere near as much social support and reinforcement as their early-maturing peers [12]. Many talented athletes drop out of sports early because of this disadvantage. Premier League research shows that late-maturing players need better learning strategies to stay in academy programs—researchers call this the "underdog effect" [13].
Sports organizations and professional clubs now use "bio-banding" to address this issue. This method groups young athletes by physical maturity instead of age, which helps spot late-developing talent [14]. An academy scientist explains: "Working within the academy, our job is to identify and develop the best future footballers. The work on growth and maturation has helped us to progress our understanding and practices in this area" [13].
The current one-dimensional system overlooks potential stars like Harry Kane. Arsenal released him at age 11 because he was physically smaller than his peers [14]. Athletes born in the first quarter often show early promise, while fourth-quarter athletes typically reveal their talent later in their development [15].
Non-linear development trajectories
Research challenges the popular pyramid model of athletic development. A study of 256 elite athletes across 27 different sports found three main trajectory patterns [2]:
Pure ascent (16.4%): Linear progression through ranks
Mixed ascent (26.2%): Progression with fluctuations
Mixed descent (57.4%): Complex oscillations with varied transitions
Most athletes (83.6%) followed non-linear paths, and less than 7% showed pure junior-to-senior linear development [2]. Athletes in sports measured by objective metrics (centimeters, grams, seconds) were less likely (43%) to follow descending trajectories compared to those in subjectively judged sports (70%) [2].
Olympic medallists' development paths tell an interesting story. They practiced an average of 3.4 sports at school and 3.1 sports outside school [16]. This variety of sporting experience contradicts early specialization models, as elite athletes played multiple sports before reaching the top [16].
Psychosocial growth during transitions
Athletes face several transitions throughout their careers that substantially affect their mental wellbeing and athletic development [17]. These changes include normative transitions (expected events like junior-to-senior advancement), non-normative transitions (unexpected events like injury), and quasi-normative transitions (predictable for specific athlete groups) [18].
Athletes returning from injury show remarkable psychosocial growth. They measure successful comebacks beyond just performance stats. Success means returning to pre-injury levels, staying focused, setting realistic expectations, feeling satisfied, dealing with injury concerns, and overcoming setbacks [19].
Student-athletes starting college benefit from belonging to multiple groups during tough transitions. This helps them stay in control and reduce stress [20]. Research links student-athlete social identity directly to psychosocial adjustment during academic transitions [20].
Understanding these hidden growth patterns helps coaches and organizations create better development systems for different paths. The recognition of these complex developmental trajectories promotes more inclusive, flexible approaches to talent development throughout life.
Integrating Biopsychosocial Factors in Development Models
Athletes need more than just physical skills to succeed. A complete development model should look at how biological, psychological, and social factors work together to shape athletic careers. Today's frameworks show that these connected elements create effective paths for athletes.
Cognitive and emotional development in adolescence
The teenage brain goes through critical changes, especially in areas that control goal-directed behavior [21]. This time offers great chances to boost cognitive function because the brain is very adaptable [5]. Physical activity helps brain development and cognitive performance by stimulating brain plasticity [5].
Studies show that regular moderate exercise during teenage years leads to better cognitive performance at age 18 [5]. A detailed analysis using movement tracking devices suggests something interesting: too much activity might hurt cognitive performance. The best results come from moderate levels of physical exercise [5].
Teenagers often struggle with emotional control. Young people who can't manage their emotions tend to act without thinking about consequences [22]. Athletes deal with many emotions - joy and pride after winning, but also frustration and shame when they feel they've failed [23]. These feelings get stronger because of performance pressure, too much training, or not having ways to express emotions [23].
Social identity and peer influence in sport
An athlete's sense of belonging to a group affects their development by a lot [4]. Athletes who feel strongly connected to their teams show more helpful behavior [4], better self-worth, and stronger commitment [4]. Team performance improves when members share a strong group identity [4].
Friends become more important during teenage years [22]. Athletes stay motivated when their peers support them [24]. Research confirms that positive friendships help young athletes keep playing sports [24]. To name just one example, when peers create an environment focused on improvement, athletes develop better life skills - this was proven in a study of 308 young participants [25].
Team environment plays a big role in emotional health. Athletes often develop anxiety when coaches criticize too much [26]. Parents can also cause problems when they care more about winning than effort, which leads athletes to hide their feelings [26].
Vocational and academic transitions
Athletic careers don't always follow a straight path. Transition periods can change career direction [27]. These changes come in different forms: expected ones like moving up to senior level or retiring, cultural adjustments, and unexpected ones like injuries [27].
Note that transitions affect every part of an athlete's life. What starts as a sports or school change creates challenges in both mental and social areas [27]. Athletes moving from part-time to full-time training find it hard to keep up with school: "It was a hard transition! When you go full-time, they don't really factor [lectures] in. It's kinda like the sport is your job, not being a student" [7].
Life changes from child to teen and teen to adult often happen alongside sports transitions - from starting out to developing skills, and then to mastering them [28]. Many athletes quit competitive sports during these multiple changes [28]. Athletes need support systems that look at their whole life, not just their athletic performance. This helps them handle these changes better.
Sport-Category-Specific vs General Models
Sports have different ways to develop athletes. This makes it hard to use the same development model everywhere. We can classify sports based on when athletes should specialize. This helps create paths that bring out the best in athletes while keeping them safe.
Early specialization sports (e.g., gymnastics)
Athletes need to start sport-specific training before puberty in early specialization sports. This happens because of unique technical demands. Athletes in gymnastics, figure skating, diving, and rhythmic gymnastics usually reach their peak before their bodies fully mature [29]. Tennis players specialize earlier than most - 70% of junior elite players start focusing only on tennis by age 10, and 95% by age 18 [29]. Figure skaters also tend to pick their sport before they turn 10 [30].
The science behind early specialization links to skill development windows. Athletes must learn certain movements before growth spurts change their body proportions. These sports need a four-stage model (Training to Train → Training to Compete → Training to Win → Retirement/Retainment) instead of the full seven-stage framework [31].
Early specialization comes with its share of risks. Daily sports training with technical, sport-specific routines often leads to injuries [30]. Athletes' bodies don't get enough time to heal from minor strains when they train every day. This affects growth plates in young athletes the most.
Late specialization sports (e.g., rowing)
Late specialization sports work better with a broad training approach at first. Athletes learn basic movement skills before diving into sport-specific techniques. Team sports, combat sports, cycling, racquet sports, rowing, and athletics follow this path [32]. NCAA Division I athletes in these sports start specializing much later. Lacrosse, American football, and field hockey athletes usually pick their main sport around ages 17.2, 17.2, and 16.8 [29].
Late specialization sports use a five-stage model that starts with the FUNdamental stage [32]. Starting before age ten often leads to burnout and early retirement from training and competition [32]. Athletes need strong foundations first. They must develop agility, balance, coordination, and speed—the ABCs of athleticism [32].
Paralympic and Masters sport considerations
Athlete development models need major changes for Paralympic athletes. Their development paths look quite different from able-bodied athletes. Many countries still don't have good systems from local to national level for parasport. This creates big hurdles in sport participation [33]. Athletes with disabilities find fewer chances in organized club sports, development programs, coaching expertise, and funding [33].
The American Development Model for Paralympic Sport launched as part of the national ADM initiative. It uses a five-stage framework that combines training, competition, and recovery based on biological development [34]. This Paralympic-focused approach helps athletes stay in sports longer and creates fair chances for recreation and competition [34].
Paralympic and Masters athletes need flexible entry and exit points in development models. These athletes might start sports at any age or stage after various life experiences. They need personalized progress timelines and adapted training methods.
Designing Inclusive and Adaptive Athlete Pathways
Athletes need flexible development pathways that work with different growth patterns throughout their sports careers. Sports organizations now know that strict frameworks don't support the complex reality of an athlete's experience.
Flexible entry and exit points in sport systems
Talent development needs systems with multiple entry and exit points. Research on talent development systems in rugby union shows that teams first select players at age 15, with many changes in selection afterward [35]. English soccer takes a different approach, where teams pick players before their teen years [35]. Young athletes benefit when they get chances to practice with older competitors. This works well when children find it suitable and fun [35].
Support for transitions and re-engagement
Many adults quit sports because they can't find the right playing opportunities. They struggle with other life priorities and get little support from sports organizations [36]. Sports organizations have created new programs to bring people back. These include casual sessions and modified versions like walking football, netball, basketball, and rugby [36]. Athletes who handle changes well both in sports and life have a better chance at long, successful sporting careers [37].
Policy implications for national sport organizations
Young athletes face a big hurdle - the cost of playing sports averages £7,100 per year [38]. Parents and charitable donations fully support more than two-thirds of young athletes [38]. Sports organizations must create inclusive policies. These policies should keep talent pathways available to everyone, whatever their background, money situation, or location [39].
Conclusion
Our deep look at athlete development shows that traditional linear models don't match the real-life ups and downs of sporting careers. The numbers tell us that most elite athletes (83.6%) don't follow a straight path - they face plenty of highs and lows. So development frameworks need to change to match these natural variations.
Regular approaches have big gaps. They push too hard for early specialization, expect rigid progress, and don't guide athletes well after their competitive days. The seven-stage LTAD model gives good structure, but athletic development isn't a simple ladder. It's more like a complex web where biological, psychological, and social factors all connect.
Sports systems are missing out on late bloomers and athletes who want to return to competition. Organizations should create multiple entry and exit points. This lets people get involved whenever their abilities show up. Physical growth, mental development, and social situations affect how fast athletes progress.
Each sport needs its own development path. Some sports like gymnastics need early specialized training. Team sports work better with broader basic skills. Athletes in Paralympics and Masters categories just need different frameworks that work for their unique situations.
Coaches, parents, and administrators should see athletic development as a lifelong experience with many paths to success. The future looks bright when we welcome individual differences and help athletes through key changes in their careers. This creates more successful athletes at every life stage. We need flexible, customized paths that tap into the full potential of human growth - not rigid frameworks.
Key Takeaways
New research reveals that athlete development is far more complex than traditional models suggest, with most elite athletes following non-linear pathways that challenge conventional wisdom about sports progression.
• 83.6% of elite athletes follow non-linear development trajectories with ups and downs, contradicting the myth that success requires steady progression from junior to senior levels.
• Early specialization increases injury risk by 60% and causes burnout, while late bloomers like Harry Kane (released at age 11) often become elite performers through diverse sport participation.
• Sport-specific pathways are essential - gymnastics requires early focus due to technical demands, while team sports benefit from multi-sport participation until age 16-17.
• Biopsychosocial factors significantly impact development including cognitive growth during adolescence, peer relationships, and academic transitions that occur alongside athletic progression.
• Flexible entry and exit points are crucial for inclusive systems, as many talented athletes enter sport later in life or return after breaks, requiring adaptive pathways rather than rigid frameworks.
The future of athlete development lies in personalized, flexible approaches that embrace individual differences and provide multiple routes to success throughout the lifespan, moving beyond one-size-fits-all models to support diverse athletic journeys.
References
[1] - https://par4success.com/7-stages-long-term-athletic-development/[2] - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24251738/[3] - https://us.humankinetics.com/blogs/excerpt/long-term-athlete-development-follows-seven-stages?srsltid=AfmBOoqSVcB21f2LtzmTW2qKZC32QQQUbm2VIoIFAX17MOf2YziERPuI[4] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1612197X.2023.2229349[5] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4563921/[6] - https://sportforlife.ca/long-term-development/[7] - https://www.tass.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kite-parris-2025-athletes-transitions-from-part-time-to-full-time-performance-programs-athletes-and-coaches.pdf[8] - https://ltad.alpinecanada.org/stages/train-to-train[9] - https://sportforlife.ca/stages/train-to-compete/[10] - https://sportforlife.ca/stages/train-to-win/[11] - https://fitness.edu.au/the-fitness-zone/a-guide-to-the-long-term-athletic-development-model/[12] - https://www.faithfamilyfit.org/late-bloomers-boys-home/why-research-late-bloomers[13] - https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/improving-the-assessment-monitoring-and-consideration-of-growth-and-maturation-in-young-athletes/[14] - https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/dec/19/biobanding-scientists-skinny-kids-sporting-superstars[15] - https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/files/40761880/JoE_4_4_Gottwald_etal.pdf[16] - https://www.mov-sport-sciences.org/articles/sm/full_html/2018/04/sm180042/sm180042.html[17] - https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/32663/1/Chapter3_Transitions_Review (Final - Track Changes Accepted).pdf[18] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1612197X.2020.1737836[19] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1469029209000223[20] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1469029221000972[21] - https://bmcsportsscimedrehabil.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13102-025-01268-2[22] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11281062/[23] - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391030914_Exploring_the_Emotional_Lives_of_Adolescent_Athletes_Under_Competitive_Pressure[24] - https://jsfd.org/2021/11/01/the-influence-of-peers-on-life-skill-development-and-transfer-in-a-sport-based-positive-youth-development-program/[25] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02640414.2021.1939980[26] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11052891/[27] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10413200.2025.2495573[28] - https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=105608§ion=2[29] - https://www.sportsmed.org/membership/sports-medicine-update/fall-2024/the-fallacy-of-falling-behind-the-realities-of-early-sports-specialization[30] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_sports_specialization[31] - https://www.brianmac.co.uk/ltad.htm[32] - https://sportmedbc.com/article/long-term-athlete-development-the-b-c-approach/[33] - https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/8/123[34] - https://www.paralympic.org/news/us-paralympics-launches-athlete-development-model[35] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11586172/[36] - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02614367.2021.1888310[37] - https://www.port.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-02/Career_Development_and_Transitions_of_Athletes.pdf[38] - https://www.sportengland.org/funding-and-campaigns/talent[39] - https://www.sportengland.org/news-and-inspiration/funding-announced-help-develop-inclusive-talent-pathways
