Why Distancing Yourself Is the Secret to Better Self-Control
- Dr Paul McCarthy
- 13 minutes ago
- 18 min read
Distancing yourself from intense emotions might feel unnatural, but it's one of the most effective strategies to improve self-control. Research shows that psychological distancing decreases self-referential processing in the brain and reduces medial prefrontal cortex activity during emotionally charged moments. This move allows us to manage reactions more effectively. Distancing ourselves from overwhelming feelings can lower negative affect while increasing positive emotions. You might be learning how to distance yourself from someone or trying to make better decisions under pressure. Either way, this technique offers practical benefits. I'll walk you through the science, methods and ground applications of self-distancing.
What is psychological distancing and why it matters
The concept of stepping back from your emotions
Psychological distancing describes our knowing how to step back from a situation without an immediate response, survey the environment, and reflect on the course of action instead of being dominated by immediate simulation [1]. Think of it as creating mental space between you and an emotionally charged event. Psychological distancing allows me to see things differently rather than react on impulse when I encounter a situation that triggers strong feelings.
This technique connects directly to executive functioning, a set of cognitive abilities controlled by the frontal lobe. Executive functioning makes better regulation of emotions possible, which in turn gives rise to psychological distancing [1]. Two specific abilities make this work: shifting and response inhibition. Shifting involves rotating or diverting attention to another aspect of a problem. Response inhibition restrains that original emotional response [1]. I can respond differently and more effectively by preventing myself from acting on my first emotional impulse.
How distance creates clarity
Psychological distancing acts like a wide-angle lens [1]. I can zoom out and see events as part of a more extensive process instead of staying stuck in a narrow, magnified view of my experience. This move in viewpoint produces several benefits.
First, it weakens the clutch of negative emotions [1]. Distancing allows me to experience those feelings without being overwhelmed by them when I'm caught in an emotionally intense moment. The emotional effect becomes less intense and makes rational thought possible again.
Second, distancing helps with long-term planning. I become better able to define goals and meet deadlines by seeing things from a different angle [1]. The forest becomes visible again, not just the trees. The specific details of any decision fade away from a distant viewpoint and allow me to focus on what truly matters [2]. This broader view lets me think over multiple aspects of a situation at once.
Psychological distance takes several forms: temporal, spatial, social, and hypothetical [3][4]. Temporal distance involves the time between now and earlier or later events. Spatial distance refers to physical separation from a situation. Social distance describes the gap between myself and others. Hypothetical distance relates to the probability of something happening [4]. Each type offers a different pathway to clarity.
The connection between distance and self-control
Self-control requires making decisions consistent with long-term goals when faced with immediate temptations [2]. This demands ignoring short-term rewards to pursue other objectives. Psychological distance makes this process easier.
Distance allows me to mentally go beyond the immediate, egocentric experience of a situation, which represents a step I just need to take in exerting conscious control [2]. My choices get influenced by specific, immediate concerns when I'm too close to a problem. From a distant viewpoint, I commit to options with highly desirable outcomes, even if they're less feasible right now [2].
The relationship works through viewpoint changes. High-level thinking relates to "why" questions about long-term goals. Low-level thinking focuses on "how" questions about immediate feasibility [2]. Self-control becomes easier by asking myself why I'm doing something rather than how [2]. This explains why people reason more wisely when solving problems for others. That natural distance provides automatic viewpoint that we struggle to achieve with our own challenges.
Creating psychological distance stabilizes specific emotional patterns and reduces the effect of external stimuli [2]. My emotional states become less externally controllable and give me greater autonomy over my responses. This increased stability are the foundations for genuine self-control.
The science behind self-distancing
How your brain processes distanced views
My brain activates different neural networks when I adopt a self-distanced view than when I'm self-immersed. Self-distanced reflection involves greater interaction between the anterior hippocampus and the posterior medial network [4]. This interaction supports my knowing how to recall details while recreating mental images and allows me to reconstruct experiences from an outside vantage point.
The brain regions that light up during distancing differ from those involved in standard emotional processing. Distancing activates several areas:
Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex
Medial prefrontal cortex
Lateral prefrontal cortex
Precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex
Inferior parietal sulcus
Middle and superior temporal gyrus
Distancing decreases activation in the amygdala [5], the region responsible for emotional responses. Studies found reduced activity in the left amygdala [4]. Similar reductions occurred in the bilateral amygdala using comparable distancing techniques [4]. The amygdala drives intense emotional reactions, so this decreased activation explains why you feel calmer when you distance yourself.
Self-distancing involves distributed patches of posterior cortical activation [5] and sets itself apart from other emotion regulation strategies that rely more on frontal areas. This posterior involvement makes distancing unique in how it reshapes my emotional experience.
Research findings on emotional regulation
Multiple controlled studies support self-distancing. One experiment explored anger and aggression. Participants who reflected on past provocations from a self-distanced view showed less anger [2]. The findings went further. Provoked participants who self-distanced displayed less aggressive behavior than those who self-immersed or were in a control group [6].
Self-distancing produces concrete emotional benefits. Compared to self-immersion, it results in fewer negative emotions [2] and reduced physiological distress [2]. When you take a self-distanced view in heated moments, you experience fewer aggressive thoughts and angry feelings [2].
Research with fifth graders demonstrated that children benefit from this approach. Students randomly assigned to reflect on painful autobiographical experiences from a self-distanced view became less upset after reflecting on those events [7]. This decrease in negative emotion occurred because of shifts in thought content—more reconstruing and less recounting [7], plus a decrease in interpersonal blame [7].
The temporal aspect matters. Studies tracking effects over time found that reappraisal-related changes lasted from 30 minutes up to one week [8]. Both reinterpretation and distancing reduced negative feelings compared to passively looking at aversive content [8], though reinterpretation produced a stronger decrease than distancing [8].
The role of self-referential processing
Self-referential processing refers to relating information to myself and often activates specific brain regions. Neuroimaging studies show that cortical midline regions, especially the anterior portion, associate with rumination [9]. Healthy subjects adopted thought processing strategies that induced rumination during recall of negative memories. Neural activity increased in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex [9].
The default mode network becomes active when my brain rests and isn't engaged in external tasks. Self-referential processing predominates during rest [9]. Anterior cortical midline structures show increased activity levels in depression [9] and suggest that excessive self-focus contributes to emotional dysfunction.
Self-distancing interrupts this problematic pattern. Distancing improved interpersonal perceptions and behavior by decreasing self-referential processing during criticism provision [2]. The mechanism works because high self-referential processing keeps attention focused on myself, whereas distancing broadens that focus outward.
People adopt a first-person view when processing intense emotions [2]. They replay anger-inducing situations without resolving them and spiral into rumination and negative affect [2]. This approach backfires and perpetuates negative thoughts rather than improving how I feel [2]. Self-distancing makes adaptive reflection on negative experiences possible through visual shifts (evaluating from an observer's viewpoint) or linguistic shifts (using third-person self-talk) [2]. Both strategies change situation-related thoughts from "Why am I so angry?" to "Why is he/she so angry?" while still thinking about myself [2].
Research stressed that high-affect individuals profit most from self-distancing because it makes self-control possible [2]. Distancing yourself provides the mental space needed to regulate responses for those of us who experience emotions intensely.
When emotions hijack your self-control
Recognizing emotionally charged situations
Emotionally charged moments arrive like unexpected storms. An amygdala hijack refers to an immediate and overwhelming emotional response that is disproportionate to the actual stimulus because it has triggered a more important perceived threat [10]. The amygdala notices a match to past threatening experiences and triggers the HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal) axis, overtaking rational brain function [10]. This emotional brain activity processes information milliseconds earlier than the rational brain. The amygdala acts before any direction from the neocortex can be received [10].
We can't learn during a hijack. We rely on over-learned habits and ways we've behaved time and time again [10]. The hijack captures our attention and beams it in on the threat at hand. If you're at work when you have an amygdala hijack, you can't focus on what your job just needs. You can only think about what's troubling you [10].
Your body gives warning signs. Shoulders tense up. Your stomach churns. The amygdala often makes mistakes, especially in modern life where the dangers are symbolic and not physical threats [10]. We overreact in ways we often regret later. These familiar sensations that a hijack is beginning make it easier to stop it before the situation escalates [10].
The cost of self-immersed thinking
Self-absorbed individuals don't show much concern about anyone or anything outside their narrow self-interest [6]. Overly focused on themselves, they can miss the mark when trying to understand the thoughts and feelings of others [6].
The Dalai Lama noted that people who have the tendency to use more self-referential terms (I, me, myself) tend to have more health problems and earlier deaths [6]. Constant self-absorption undermines our capacity for empathy and true understanding of the thoughts, feelings, needs and desires of others [6]. Our relationships suffer damage, sometimes irreparably, by a self-preoccupation that undermines the closeness that all relationships require [6].
Rumination plays a destructive role. A ruminative response style predicts the onset of a subsequent major depressive episode when controlling for initial levels of depression [11]. Rumination exacerbates dysphoric mood, increases negative thinking and impairs social problem solving compared with distraction [11]. Ruminative self-focus was associated with negative affect during the everyday lives of participants [11].
Research found that people who didn't ruminate or blame themselves for their difficulties had much lower levels of depression and anxiety, even if they'd experienced many negative events in their lives [5]. Rumination was found to be more damaging than self-blame [5]. Brooding too much on negative events is the biggest predictor of depression and anxiety. It determines the level of stress people experience [5].
Why immediate reactions often backfire
People in an affectively 'cold' state fail to appreciate how 'hot' states will affect their own priorities and behavior [4]. They underestimate the influence of those states when in hot states. As a result, they overestimate the stability of their current priorities [4]. If we receive an email from our boss that makes us very angry, we may send a nasty email back. We don't think over that our anger would subside, and this can have negative consequences on our job [12].
From a neurological point of view, irritation and anger trigger the fight-or-flight response. The amygdala becomes activated. Stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline increase [13]. When someone hears an irritated tone, even if the message is valid, their nervous system interprets it as a threat. The prefrontal cortex takes a back seat. Instead of listening and understanding, they protect themselves [13].
So a polite request often gets cooperation while an irritated tone often gets resistance [13]. We may feel temporary relief when we react impulsively, but the other person feels resentment. The issue remains unresolved and the relationship absorbs damage [13].
How distancing yourself improves decision-making
Reducing emotional intensity
Strong emotions cloud judgment and make rational thinking difficult. You produce measurable changes in how you feel those emotions when you distance yourself from negative experiences. Participants used distancing strategies while viewing aversive images and reported less negative emotion compared to just looking at the images [2]. The reduction wasn't subtle. People could reduce their subjective negative reactions to difficult social scenes with this strategy [2].
The emotional benefits extend beyond the moment. Distancing appears adaptive in reducing the intensity of angry affect and depressive affect, along with blood pressure responses [2]. Participants who reflected on past provocations from a self-distanced point of view showed measurably less anger than those who stayed self-immersed in behavioral studies.
Distancing proves versatile across different emotion types, though it works better for some feelings than others. A self-distanced point of view attenuates feelings of sadness and anger more [7]. But distancing may not be as beneficial for regulating feelings of guilt and shame [7]. These findings reveal an important boundary condition for the technique.
Training in distancing produces lasting effects over time. One study found that training in distancing was associated with decreased stress in daily life and more neutral evaluations of aversive content when no regulation was instructed [7]. Other emotion regulation training methods didn't produce these benefits [7].
Seeing the bigger picture
Psychological distancing results in taking a broader point of view [14]. This change allows me to see consequences more and understand the best way to allocate resources. I tend to see things more in line with long-term goals rather than getting trapped in considerations of the here and now when I create psychological distance from a decision [9].
Research demonstrates that people make the most efficient decisions with this big picture point of view [9]. Participants prompted to think big picture were more likely than others to make decisions that would maximize the total value, whether they benefited most or whether others did [9]. This matters because the most efficient decision is the one that maximizes the total pie, and that remains true whether more goes to me or to someone else [9].
Habitual self-distancing predicts more concrete problem construal, which in turn predicts more analytical processing and less urgent intuitive processing [15]. Fearful decision-makers tend to construe problems less, which hinders knowing how to analyze problems with risk [15]. Therefore, distancing helps me avoid the trap of abstract worry and keeps me grounded in concrete analysis.
The technique helps minimize waste when making decisions while maximizing net gain for everyone [9]. I can see beyond my self-interest and recognize when a choice that seems selfish produces the best overall outcome by stepping back.
Making rational choices under pressure
Stress alters how I make decisions. Fast and effortless heuristics dominate over slow and demanding deliberation under stress [16]. Stressed individuals tend to make more habitual responses than goal-directed choices, be less likely to adjust their judgment and rely more on gut feelings in social situations [16]. Stress makes decision makers more impulsive and more likely to make unexamined responses [16].
Distancing counteracts this stress-induced change. Leaders can use micro-distancing by taking brief mental pauses to change point of view before responding in ever-changing settings [17]. This might mean asking myself what I would tell a colleague to do, or picturing the situation from a balcony view [17]. Calling a short pause prevents reactive mistakes while still meeting operational tempo [17].
Emotion regulation through distancing affects subsequent decision-making in concrete ways. Emotion regulation was followed by less risky decisions, which was reflected in increased activation in brain regions associated with cognitive control [8]. Participants who used cognitive regulation made fewer risky choices compared to trials where decisions were made without regulation [8].
Distancing helps leaders regulate emotions by changing attention away from the self-threat of the moment [17]. Leaders disengage from defensive patterns and see events more objectively at the time they imagine themselves as a future version, an outside observer, or in a different location [17]. This reduces the fight-or-flight response and enables calmer and more rational thinking even in high-pressure situations [17].
Self-distancing techniques you can use today
Psychological distancing in practice doesn't require extensive training or special equipment. Several evidence-based techniques offer immediate access to the benefits of distancing yourself.
Using third-person self-talk
You create instant psychological distance when you refer to yourself by name or use third-person pronouns (you, he, she) instead of first-person pronouns (I, me, my). This linguistic change helps you stay calm without much additional cognitive effort when distress hits [18].
The speed of this technique surprises most people. Researchers who monitored brain activity found that emotional distress decreased within one second when someone began referring to themselves in the third person [18]. This happened because using your own name to refer to yourself guides you to think about yourself more as you think about others [18].
To name just one example, instead of thinking "I'm so nervous about this presentation," try "Sarah is nervous about this presentation." The simple language change triggers an automatic change in view. The cognitive effort required is minimal compared to other emotion regulation strategies [18]. This makes third-person self-talk one of the most effortless forms of self-control [19].
Watching yourself from an observer's view
You create spatial distance when you visualize yourself from outside your body. Picture a fly on the wall observing your challenging experience, or think about how a thoughtful friend might respond after watching your situation [20]. This mental repositioning suspends some of the immediate emotional reactions you're experiencing.
Research with five-year-olds showed the power of this technique. Children who imagined Batman observing their distressing situation and asked themselves "What would Batman do?" self-distanced more effectively [20]. Adults can use the same principle and imagine any respected figure observing their behavior.
The temporal distancing method
Temporal distancing involves reflecting on how you'll feel about a situation much later in the future [21]. Ask yourself: "How would I feel about this one week from now or ten years from now?" [20]. This mental time travel directs attention away from immediate, concrete circumstances and toward a broader view.
Greater habitual use of temporal distancing associates with lesser daily negative emotions and greater daily positive emotions [21]. People who employ this strategy when managing daily stressors tend to report better emotional regulation [22].
Taking a physical break
Sometimes distancing yourself requires actual physical distance. Take a break for 15 minutes or leave the space when you're in an emotionally charged situation like an argument [1]. Walk away, take a walk outside, or sit in a different room. Physical movement disrupts the immediate intensity and allows you to reframe the situation.
Even subtle physical changes help. Research found that leaning back in your seat can increase psychological distance from the difficulty in front of you [23]. This backward movement helps reduce the emotional effect of challenging tasks.
Asking 'what would I tell a friend?'
This technique taps into the natural distance we have when solving problems for others. Ask yourself what advice you'd give a close friend in the same situation when facing a difficult decision [24]. This reframing provides automatic view that we struggle to achieve with our own challenges.
The question changes your mental position from inside the problem to outside it and accesses wisdom that feels blocked when you're self-immersed.
Distancing yourself from people without burning bridges
Creating healthy emotional boundaries
Healthy boundaries help you establish and build healthy relationships while avoiding unhealthy connections [6]. Boundaries aren't walls that shut people out. They establish expectations and communicate how you want to be treated in a relationship [11].
You need self-awareness to set boundaries [5]. You need clarity about your expectations of yourself and others, and what you are and are not comfortable with in specific situations [5]. Anxiety and stress develop at the time you take responsibility for others' emotions, behaviors, and thoughts [6]. Healthy boundaries prevent this by defining where your responsibility ends and another person's begins.
Good communication skills convey assertiveness and clarity at the time of setting boundaries [5]. Assertiveness involves expressing your feelings with respect [5]. It doesn't entail making demands, but it requires people to listen to you [5]. To cite an instance, saying "I'm not available for work calls after 6 p.m." states your needs without apologizing or over-explaining [5].
When to distance yourself from someone
You protect your well-being at the time you recognize that distancing yourself from someone becomes necessary. Several signs indicate a relationship may require distance. Someone uses everything you tell them against you and gains your trust only to exploit your vulnerabilities later—they behave like a manipulator [10]. A good friend doesn't hoard your secrets to use your weaknesses against you [10].
One-sided friendships drain your energy. You're always doing all the work in maintaining the relationship, so it might be time to re-evaluate [25]. You feel like you just need to be someone else around this person—there's fear that they don't accept you for who you truly are [25].
People who only see the worst-case scenario contaminate you with negativity [10]. You want to surround yourself with people who make you feel like life offers possibilities, not constant catastrophe [10]. Distance becomes the healthiest way to set boundaries with someone who brings you nothing but pain and anger [26].
Maintaining relationships while protecting yourself
A big, explosive breakup isn't always necessary. A drifting apart is easier and healthier [13]. Rather than confrontation, allow things to drift apart and let the friendship progress into nonexistence [25].
Stop making plans to cut down on face time. Avoid initiating conversations to grow the distance between you [13]. Keep the conversations you do have polite but formal. Stick to small talk or keep the focus on work to avoid more personal topics [13].
Be respectful and cordial at the time you see them. Maintain eye contact and provide help if they really need it [13]. You're setting boundaries and ending the friendship, not hurting anyone's feelings [13]. So avoid spreading rumors or criticizing them in front of other people, as this only perpetuates conflict [13].
Common mistakes when practicing psychological distancing
Psychological distancing benefits collapse when applied incorrectly. Several common errors undermine the technique's effectiveness and can lead to worse outcomes than not distancing yourself at all.
Confusing distancing with avoidance
Many people mistake psychological distancing for emotional avoidance, but research shows these are fundamentally different processes [27]. Avoidance involves pushing away negative feelings and thoughts. This leads to ruminative patterns and exacerbates negative feelings instead of easing them [27]. Avoidance serves as a risk factor for numerous maladaptive outcomes [27].
Self-distancing involves engagement with emotional content from a removed view [27]. Participants in distancing studies were directed to reflect on the emotional aspects of their distressing experiences rather than avoid them [28]. Self-distancing negatively correlated with emotional reactivity, while avoidance positively correlated with it [29]. The emotionally-engaging qualities of self-distancing explain its positive effects on stress responses [27].
Trying to distance when immediate action is needed
Distancing yourself doesn't work in every situation. Research indicates that adopting a self-distanced visual view proves harmful when people with social phobia imagine stressful circumstances that drive their fear [12]. Other studies found that visual self-distancing produced no emotion regulation effects for people reflecting on past experiences that bring out guilt or embarrassment [12].
Context matters. Distancing works best when reflecting on negative past experiences [27], but may backfire in situations requiring immediate engagement or when specific emotion types are involved.
Not allowing yourself to feel emotions
Some people use distancing to minimize event importance and reduce their investment in meaningful situations [4]. This approach creates long-term negative implications because people might not give their best effort [4]. Distancing requires cognitive effort [30]. The goal isn't to eliminate emotions but to process them more effectively. You must accept your experiences while stepping outside them to observe without becoming overwhelmed.
Real-world applications of self-distancing
Theory becomes valuable when applied to daily challenges. Self-distancing proves effective in life domains of all types, from professional settings to personal relationships.
Managing workplace conflicts
Workplace disagreements often trigger defensiveness that blocks resolution. When facing criticism from a co-worker, imagine how a neutral, objective observer would notice the situation. This minimizes the incident's emotional effect [3]. Research on decision-making showed that priming people to reason about issues that matter to them from a distanced view improves wise reasoning and cooperation-related attitudes. It also makes them more willing to join collaborative groups [31]. Distance yourself during workplace tensions. This promotes dialecticism and intellectual humility rather than rigid position-taking. Studies exploring anger management found that reflecting on past provocations from a self-distanced view reduces aggressive thoughts and angry feelings. This leads to less aggressive behavior than self-immersed reflection [31].
Handling relationship arguments
Couples benefit by a lot from psychological distancing during conflicts. A study with 100 participants in long-term relationships asked one group to imagine being cheated on. Another group imagined a friend being cheated on [2]. Those thinking about a friend showed nowhere near as much poor judgment as those imagining themselves in that scenario [2]. Third-person thinking during arguments boosts empathy and allows partners to recognize each other's thoughts and feelings rather than focusing on their own positions alone [7]. This heightened empathy replaces contempt with compassion [7].
Making important life decisions
Major life choices overwhelm us with emotional weight. Step outside yourself and think about what you'd tell a friend in your exact situation. This realizes reasoning and wisdom that feels blocked when self-immersed [2]. This addresses Solomon's Paradox, where we give better advice to others than ourselves [32].
Coping with anxiety and stress
Performance anxiety diminishes when using self-distancing. Research with 133 participants preparing speeches found that those using third-person pronouns during preparation performed better according to objective raters. They also displayed less distress than first-person thinkers [4]. Self-distancing led to greater challenge rather than threat responses, which suggests people felt more confident [4].
Conclusion
Psychological distancing offers a practical pathway to better self-control without requiring years of practice. In fact, techniques like third-person self-talk and observer perspectives work within seconds. They create the mental space needed for rational decisions. The key lies in active involvement rather than avoidance. Reflect on challenging situations from a distanced viewpoint while still acknowledging your emotions. Distancing yourself helps you respond with wisdom rather than impulse, whether you're managing workplace conflicts, relationship tensions, or major life decisions. Start with one technique that strikes a chord most. Practice it during low-stakes moments and watch your self-control strengthen over time.
Key Takeaways on Better Self-Control
Psychological distancing is a scientifically-backed technique that creates mental space between you and emotionally charged situations, enabling better self-control and decision-making.
• Use third-person self-talk for instant emotional regulation - Referring to yourself by name or "you" instead of "I" reduces emotional distress within one second with minimal cognitive effort.
• Step back mentally to see the bigger picture - Psychological distancing shifts your brain from narrow, emotional processing to broader perspective-taking, improving long-term decision-making.
• Practice observer perspective during conflicts - Imagine watching yourself from outside or ask "What would I tell a friend?" to access wisdom that feels blocked when self-immersed.
• Distance engages emotions, avoidance suppresses them - True distancing involves reflecting on emotional content from a removed perspective, not pushing feelings away, which actually worsens outcomes.
• Apply temporal distancing for better choices - Ask yourself "How will I feel about this in 10 years?" to reduce immediate emotional intensity and focus on what truly matters.
When emotions hijack your self-control, these distancing techniques provide immediate access to clearer thinking and more rational responses, whether you're handling workplace stress, relationship conflicts, or major life decisions.
References
[1] - https://positivepsychology.com/psychological-distancing/[2] - https://mashable.com/article/how-to-make-hard-decisions[3] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6326885/[4] - https://www.anxietycentre.com/research/self-distancing-can-reduce-anxiety-and-stress/[5] - https://positivepsychology.com/great-self-care-setting-healthy-boundaries/[6] - https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/setting-boundaries-for-well-being[7] - https://www.merinohomes.com.au/a-specific-mental-strategy-appears-to-boost-relationship-problem-solving-in-a-big-way/[8] - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392071837_Emotional_Regulation_and_its_Relationship_with_Decision-Making_Ability_among_University_Female_Students_in_Saudi_Arabia[9] - https://news.osu.edu/how-looking-at-the-big-picture-can-lead-to-better-decisions/[10] - https://medium.com/the-writers-fight-club/5-signs-that-its-time-to-distance-yourself-from-your-friends-35b96bcbfff4[11] - https://www.rootsrelationaltherapy.com/blogs-for-better-relationships/how-to-set-boundaries-a-better-approach-in-10-steps[12] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S002210311300139X[13] - https://www.wikihow.com/Slowly-Drift-Away-from-a-Person[14] - https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/35/5/800/1785239[15] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886923003069[16] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5146206/[17] - https://www.speakers.ca/2025/08/david-marquet-on-distancing-the-decision-making-tool-every-leader-needs/[18] - https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/the-athletes-way/201707/silent-third-person-self-talk-facilitates-emotion-regulation[19] - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-04047-3[20] - https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/four_ways_to_gain_perspective_on_negative_events[21] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9905369/[22] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886925004520[23] - https://mediate.com/5-uncomplicated-ways-to-gain-psychological-distance-during-conflict-and-why-you-should/[24] - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/danielpink_stuck-on-a-big-decision-you-might-be-too-activity-7340341651703230465-gqGy[25] - https://chalene.com/podcasts/7-signs-its-time-to-let-go-of-a-friend/[26] - https://collectiveworld.substack.com/p/its-okay-to-distance-yourself-from[27] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210843/[28] - https://rascl.studentorg.berkeley.edu/assets/files/88. Orvell et al 2020 CPS.pdf[29] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2881638/[30] - https://tu-dresden.de/mn/psychologie/ifap/differentielle-psychologie/ressourcen/dateien/pdfs-publikationen/2021/effort-beats-effectiveness-in-emotion-regulation-choice-differences-between-suppression-and-distancing-in-subjective-and-physiological-measures[31] - https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/insight-therapy/202012/science-based-technique-coping-stress[32] - https://victormong.medium.com/you-dont-always-do-what-s-best-for-you-and-you-don-t-know-why-plus-2-easy-tricks-to-fix-it-bde1326d44dc
